Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Officer in trouble over motorist's video in South County(Cop caught threatening to invent Charges)
St. Louis Post-Dispatch ^ | 09/11/2007 | By Patrick M. O'Connell and Georgina Gustin

Posted on 09/12/2007 8:20:27 AM PDT by SubGeniusX

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-176 next last
To: Spktyr
Um, he just said that he would be more than willing to “make up” charges to send someone to jail.

While he might have meant that...he didn't say that. He said "come up with". Coming up with charges can be legitimate, nitpicky, or illegitimate.

61 posted on 09/12/2007 9:09:22 AM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: o_zarkman44
"The sheriff of Nottingham has all authority over the subjects of the kingdom."

This could end if we try to make it happen like this kid is doing. Young smartass that he is, he is in fact trying to do something about a situation that has gotten out of control and I think we ought all to be helping in whatever way we can.

First step is to recognize criminal behavior when you see it, regardless of whether the criminal has a uniform on at the time.

62 posted on 09/12/2007 9:12:00 AM PDT by Lloyd227 (and may God bless Oriana Fallaci)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Para-Ord.45
Now we all know why so they are sometimes called “ Pigs” .
Your comment is grossly insulting but does provide a public display of your ignorance, bias and immaturity.
I hope your life depends on a cop showing up to save your sorry @ss someday. You'll be whistling a different tune.
63 posted on 09/12/2007 9:13:21 AM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: gura

You know those National Guardsman were what the liberal media call baby boomers, the last generation to volunteer for the military in large numbers.


64 posted on 09/12/2007 9:13:32 AM PDT by ansel12 (Romney longed to serve in Vietnam, ask me for the quote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: CholeraJoe

Yes, defense attorneys are stellar witnesses as well.

As a former LEO I say he should be fired at a minimum. Efforts must be made to weed out the losers to ensure integrity and public trust which sad to say is waining quickly. I will say out of the vast numbers of police officers there are more good ones than bad. The problem in the small towns is low pay and the type of person that attracts, catch-22, you need someone but you cannot draw quality people.

I worked for over 12 years and never made up a charge or stole anything from anyone and I know lots who followed suit. Be careful of using absolutes.


65 posted on 09/12/2007 9:13:51 AM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Lloyd227

It could end if people would stand up against tyranny.

Unfortunately, many people have a problem standing up for anything when challenged. This nation has become a bunch of wussies.


66 posted on 09/12/2007 9:14:34 AM PDT by o_zarkman44 (No Bull in 08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: liege
"I may be going out on a limb here, but I think there needs to first be a trial by jury. If he is convicted, then he goes to jail. Please correct me if I'm wrong. "

Ok, you're not wrong and of course there should be a trial.

But what I am reacting to is the obvious fact that he's not even fired, let alone charged with the crime when ample evidence exists to charge him.

Care to place odds that he ever will be charged with anything at all? Then care to consider what would already have happened to the perp if the shoe had been on the other foot?

You and I would already be in jail right now but this asshole is "suspended". yeah, there's the rule of law in action...

67 posted on 09/12/2007 9:15:15 AM PDT by Lloyd227 (and may God bless Oriana Fallaci)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: oh8eleven
"If you are out after midnight,
and you don't have to be,
bad things can happen."

My father.

68 posted on 09/12/2007 9:16:25 AM PDT by Kenny Bunk ( Teddy K's 'Immigration Reform Act' of 1965. ¡Grácias, Borracho!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr
OK... just why is this officer on suspension and not fired???

It is now common to suspend employees prior to termination. This allows companies and departments to arrange the paperwork, severance pay, various legal procedures, etc. while the employee sits out his termination safely away from his place of work.

That is what my old company did. If you a received a "3 day suspension" you'd better be using your time off pounding the pavement.

69 posted on 09/12/2007 9:16:44 AM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

Why is he not in JAIL for abuse of power.


70 posted on 09/12/2007 9:18:20 AM PDT by Leatherneck_MT (A nation of sheep will beget a government of wolves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative
"I worked for over 12 years and never made up a charge or stole anything from anyone and I know lots who followed suit. Be careful of using absolutes."

Thank you for your service and please don't think my rants here have any connection to the officers like yourself.

That said however, it's just not enough to fire the occasional bad cop when you find them. Due to the nature of the job, identifying the bad ones is too rare and too difficult for anyone to prove. When you have one cold like this incident, you must absolutely make an examplet of him.

Again, this man's actions appear criminal and he should be brought up on charges to face the jury. He has abused his authority and threatened the freedom of a citizen under false pretenses. Tell me that's not criminal.

71 posted on 09/12/2007 9:18:52 AM PDT by Lloyd227 (and may God bless Oriana Fallaci)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: oh8eleven

Yeah right.

you`re own ignorance is on display because any

halfwit knows there is no Constitutional right to

police protection. Why in the world would I call 911

to wait for a cop to finish his donut and not protect

myself first.

Indeed, the myth that cops are pure as the driven snow is

a fallacy that must be rid of, as well as ignorance of the

“right” that police are Constitutional required to protect

you.

I`ll leave you to your ‘ my opinion is reality’ life. I`ll

stick to the facts.


72 posted on 09/12/2007 9:19:06 AM PDT by Para-Ord.45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: SubGeniusX

Throw the thug cop in jail.


73 posted on 09/12/2007 9:19:42 AM PDT by Pencil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreenAccord

Profiling wasn’t the problem. Being detained is not the problem.

Threatening to send the kid to jail on trumped up charges IS the problem.

Here’s how it should have happened after the cop pulled him over:

Officer: “Good morning, sir. May I please see your license and insurance?”
Kid: “Did I do something wrong?”
Officer: “We’ve had some reports of crime in this parking lot in the early mornings; your license and insurance please?”

At which point, the kid could/should have presented the requested materials. If the kid had refused to present ID at that point, the officer could have then reminded him that (at least in Texas) you must have ID to operate a motor vehicle, and you must present that ID when asked to by an officer.

What *did* happen was that when the kid asked if he did something wrong, the cop ordered him out of the car and started verbally abusing him instead of offering any sort of explanation.

Texas law enforcement (at least) is taught that they need to be unfailingly polite and calm in all traffic stops. It’s hard, but it’s part of the job. Even the LAPD, never a bastion of correct behavior, teaches that.


74 posted on 09/12/2007 9:20:08 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Drew68
"It is now common to suspend employees prior to termination. "

But you're still missing the point. This is not a man about to be terminated for missing too many days last month.

The actions of this man are clearly criminal and he should be charged with the crime he appears to have been committed.

"termination" should be the very least of his problems at this point and if there were justice, he'd be worried about his new room mate named Bubba.

75 posted on 09/12/2007 9:21:08 AM PDT by Lloyd227 (and may God bless Oriana Fallaci)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici

And cops don’t “setup” the public to commit crime. See Larry Craig.


76 posted on 09/12/2007 9:23:01 AM PDT by Pencil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: oh8eleven

cops rarely ever arrive in time to save anything except forensics.

it is naive to thnk that a cop is going to arrive in time to save someone. Thats why we have the 2nd Amendment.
Cops rarely deterr people from breaking the law. Their reaction is secondary. The law has already been broken and they are the arm of the prosecutor.


77 posted on 09/12/2007 9:23:34 AM PDT by o_zarkman44 (No Bull in 08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Para-Ord.45

Keep posting - each time you do it reinforces everything I said.


78 posted on 09/12/2007 9:23:42 AM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Lloyd227
But what I am reacting to is the obvious fact that he's not even fired, let alone charged with the crime when ample evidence exists to charge him.

I say let the process play itself out. I, too, was angered by what I read. I don't think we have all the facts. If he has a history/pattern of this behaviour then he should lose his job(with its authority)ASAP. If this is a one-time occurrence then it will dealt with differently. Let the process work.

79 posted on 09/12/2007 9:23:59 AM PDT by bubbacluck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Belasarius

There’s no question, the kid was trying to “set up” an officer.

However, the cop took the bait willingly and freely.


80 posted on 09/12/2007 9:25:43 AM PDT by Pencil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-176 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson