Then it would seem you have a deficient reading or comprehension issue, as I said no such thing. Please do not put words or concepts to my positions. I state them clearly enough to do without addition or subtraction.
Now can you speak to the issues presented or do you simply support the idea that the states should constitutionally define the personhood of the unborn as property?
Man, you keep a tight (whatever), to wit:
I said no such thing. Please do not put words or concepts to my positions. I state them clearly enough to do without addition or subtraction.
Well, Miss precision, I stated what I think---and not what you said. So, since you mis-stated what I said, you're not really as precise as you would like to believe, are you?
You can reply tomorrow afternoon, if you want your reply read by me...say exactly at 1:31pm.