Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: geopyg
However, perhaps some of the private sailing ships had cannon?

They were called privateers.
27 posted on 09/11/2007 12:08:54 PM PDT by JamesP81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: JamesP81

Did they still have legal privateers in the late 1700’s?

Off topic - Captain Kidd was actually a privateer (not a pirate) back in the 1600’s and hired by NY businessmen and backing of the king to go after pirates. I read a great book on the “TRUE” story of Captain Kidd, and it was very well documented and he followed the rules of engagement of being a privateer, but took the fall when he was too agressive. One was taking a ship flying a French flag which was okay, but the ship was actually Dutch or something and carrying Indian textiles. He was legal in taking it, but pissed the Dutch and Indians off - who were friends with the British. There are actually the legal documents (shipping records, seals, etc.) still in London that prove his innocence but were not brought up in his kangaroo court trial.


33 posted on 09/11/2007 12:36:23 PM PDT by geopyg (Don't wish for peace, pray for Victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: JamesP81
"However, perhaps some of the private sailing ships had cannon? They were called privateers."

Or just armed merchantmen that didn't particularily want to be taken as a prize by a privateer..

69 posted on 09/11/2007 6:11:43 PM PDT by USMCVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson