Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: allmendream; Creationist
“Evidence is proof of something that happened”? Evidence = Proof? Boy you really do use your own language.

I think what you are seeing is an example of creation "science."

Please do not confuse this with real science.

90 posted on 09/09/2007 7:11:17 PM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]


To: Coyoteman
I am unlikely to do so.

I have a lifetime of education in Science. The only time I remember “proof” being offered up was in Mathematics.

In Science we deal with evidence (facts) that supports or detracts from a theory.

As such Evolution through natural selection has evidence that fills entire floors of libraries with journals like “Molecular Evolution” or “Evolution” including “Nature” and many others.

‘Evolutionism’ as defined by our mutual FRiend seems to be “evidence that was not twisted to comport with my ideas of what the Bible says and the time-line that I have ascribed Divine inerrancy to”

91 posted on 09/09/2007 8:13:22 PM PDT by allmendream (A Lyger is pretty much my favorite animal. (Hunter08))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

To: Coyoteman

Yea like what you do assume the earth is old based upon fossils and rocks. Radiometric dating is a science that the people using do not know how to properly interpret, as they believe they know all and assume that nothing can effect the decay properties of specimen.


93 posted on 09/09/2007 10:25:42 PM PDT by Creationist ( Evolution is a faith based science with no proof. Scientist are the prophets, teachers the preacher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson