Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Creationist
You use the word Apologetics as though it were a bad word.

From Webster's New Twentieth Century Dictionary 1970, page 86 a pol o get ic {Gr. apologitikos, fit for a defense, from apologeisthai to speak in defense; apo, from and legein, to speak}

So it seems to me Coyoteman you do your share of Apologetics.

To many scientists, "apologetics" is a bad word because it implies not just defense of a position, but defense of religion and religious belief.

Try a google search, "define:apologetics" and the following is what you get: eight definitions, of which seven involve a defense of Christianity.

The methods of apologetics are not scientific, but rather involve philosophy, theology, and rhetoric. Its goals are not discovery, but rather defending an a priori belief. In fact, today we most often see apologetics used to defend a priori beliefs against scientific discoveries!

Apologetics has come to be the opposite of science.

Here are the definitions:


73 posted on 09/09/2007 11:03:28 AM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: Coyoteman
Sorry Coyoteman, your education is failing you. That is not the definition of the word Apologetics.

You can change it to suit your needs but that does not nullify the original meaning.

You every time you post against the belief in creation and support of evolution are practicing Apologetics.

Apologetics does not imply any where in the dictionary as a defense in religion.

Sorry you lost that one buddy. Bad form read more.
78 posted on 09/09/2007 12:39:33 PM PDT by Creationist ( Evolution is a faith based science with no proof. Scientist are the prophets, teachers the preacher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

To: Coyoteman
I would also like to state that when someone uses a word and adds implied meaning to it, they reduce their credibility in the understanding of the English language and therefore their understanding in what their are arguing about.

Your misuse of the word implies to me that you do not understand what you are arguing about.
83 posted on 09/09/2007 12:53:58 PM PDT by Creationist ( Evolution is a faith based science with no proof. Scientist are the prophets, teachers the preacher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson