Replies

Dear Mr. expert,

What would a global flood look like approximately 4000 years later. That is one that completely covering the globe at least a mile high, with major volcanic activity and large chunks being blown into the upper atmosphere and some into outer space. Hmm?

That's easy. Just examine areas that are known to have flooded in historic times and extrapolate. Erosional evidence and silt deposits would be some of the major things to look for.

Radiometric dating is an assumptive science, first off "you" assume that the universe is old, second you assume that decay rates are constant and do not have any thing that effects them. If you say contrary you are lying to yourself and the public.

There is a significant difference between pointing out that radiometric dating is based on assumptions and you showing that those assumptions are wrong! If those assumptions are accurate and supported by other lines of evidence, then there is nothing wrong with using them!

While you are not interested in radiometric dating and related sciences except to make unsupported denials of their accuracy to support your religious belief in a young earth, here are some good links for any lurkers who want more information:

ReligiousTolerance.org Carbon-14 Dating (C-14): Beliefs of New-Earth Creationists
Radiometric Dating: A Christian Perspective by Dr. Roger C. Wiens.
This site, BiblicalChronologist.org has a series of good articles on radiocarbon dating.

Are tree-ring chronologies reliable? (The Biblical Chronologist, Vol. 5, No. 1)
How does the radiocarbon dating method work? (The Biblical Chronologist, Vol. 5, No. 1)
How precise is radiocarbon dating?
Is radiocarbon dating based on assumptions?
Has radiocarbon dating been invalidated by unreasonable results?

Tree Ring and C14 Dating
Radiocarbon WEB-info Radiocarbon Laboratory, University of Waikato, New Zealand.
Radiocarbon -- full text of issues, 1959-2003.

You have a typical no god answer.

Plus you are trying to use minuscule examples to extrapolate what a large global event would look like.

Sorry but I do not believe that a small scale flood with volcanic, earth quake, and shape shifting of the continents has ever been observed in a small scale. That is all those things happening at the same time all in one location. That means the volcano was under water during eruption, this volcano before eruption was above water.

You do not admit that you assume old age when you take a study. You do not admit that your assumption of old age is do to you lack of belief in the supernatural. You do not admit that evolution has never been observed and that radiometric dating is an assumptive science used to validate old ages for the hypothesis of evolution to probably work.

You do not admit that there is not one rock with an age stamped upon it to prove radiometric dating works and is correct.