[muawiyah]

In your pentultimate paragraph in post #12 you began telling me what I believe ~ you had no evidence to back up any of your statements.

Let me suggest that your "by faith alone" debating technique is not adequate for this environment.

[GlennD]

“In your pentultimate paragraph in post #12 you began telling me what I believe ~ you had no evidence to back up any of your statements.”(muawiyah)

Perhaps you are correct, and I made a false assumption, and if so, I apologize. I assumed, from you comment, to another, that you were saying, if he (the guy you were addressing) couldn’t give dimensions of Heaven, it’s not factual enough to have faith in some (any?) religion or faith. I don’t recall anybody asking for the dimensions of the universe, and as far as I know, there is no argument about that, other than whether the universe is actually bounded (has any ends) or not. In any case, perhaps you could make your position clear, and I won’t make false assumptions about your beliefs. You seem to have an angst against faith in any religion, and all I was pointing out was that it seems to me, as other are pointing out, much of what passes for science, now, is actually another religion, requiring equal or greater faith, just in different propositions.

“Let me suggest that your “by faith alone” debating technique is not adequate for this environment.”(muawiyah)

I’m not sure what you mean by this. Do I need college degrees to debate in this environment, and of what type and how many?-Glenn