Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Coyoteman
And your dating method of the Channeled Scablands is by fossils in the layer of rocks and the rock layer the fossils are in. Also you validate the belief of old age with radiometric dating, throwing out that which does not fit the required age.

As I thought about it more you are really to educated for your own good. You claim that most things written if not done by a person of a college degree is useless.

Would have you know most of the thing that are in your life were thought up designed discovered experimented upon without a coveted piece of parchment.
46 posted on 09/05/2007 7:48:00 PM PDT by Creationist ( Evolution is a faith based science with no proof. Scientist are the prophets, teachers the preacher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: Creationist
And your dating method of the Channeled Scablands is by fossils in the layer of rocks and the rock layer the fossils are in. Also you validate the belief of old age with radiometric dating, throwing out that which does not fit the required age.

As I thought about it more you are really to educated for your own good. You claim that most things written if not done by a person of a college degree is useless.

Would have you know most of the thing that are in your life were thought up designed discovered experimented upon without a coveted piece of parchment.

Sorry, your post has demonstrated your lack of knowledge about the Channeled Scablands in particular and archaeology in general.

The scablands are not dated by index fossils. They are dated by direct radiocarbon dating of a lot of different things, including geological and sedimentary formations, archaeological sites like Marmes Rockshelter (45FR50) for example, and by various sediments and the materials that are trapped in them. Those can include a variety of rodents and other critters, as well as carbonized plant materials and pollen.

And you have no clue how those of us who use radiocarbon dating work. You have only the creationist websites to rely on. And they are lying to you! They are doing creation "science" rather than real science--and it is entirely agenda driven.

I have studied the fields of archaeology and radiocarbon dating for several decades, and have personally submitted nearly 600 radiocarbon samples.

When you have studied the field as I have then you can feel free to lecture me on how I do my work.

Your religious belief has blinded you to the world around you.

47 posted on 09/05/2007 8:16:00 PM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson