[Coyoteman]

Now, you have to admit that in the above article, (assuming it’s quoted accurately)that is not science, but philosophy or metaphysics. I’d like to think it’s math, but I know it’s not that either. -Glenn

I agree. The conclusion of that blog is:

But you can rest assured that science proves the Bible with out the use of smoke and mirrors more that the ever changing theory of evolution does.

I entirely agree with you that this is not science, but philosophy or metaphysics. And I must add, it is not even accurate.

But it also seems that the blog is using the term "evolution" with the creationist definition of "everything in science that we disagree with!"

[GlennD]

“But it also seems that the blog is using the term “evolution” with the creationist definition of “everything in science that we disagree with!”(Coyoteman)

I suppose you are correct, but I can understand both views. The creationists are treated like a$$holes, and called stupid by “scientists,” very often, and at some point, it looks like all scientists are haters of God. Much the same, some creationists act like whatever comes from some quarters are lies. Sometimes, like in the above blog, “scientists” make such outrageous claims it deserves scorn. I suppose, cooler heads should prevail, but not usually. -Glenn