[WildcatClan]

ACM may have put more truth in these articles than the blind following of a perceived winner will allow. Stand by for a plethora of “snowballs chance in hell”, “he’s a good guy, but he has no chance”, comments.

There is never any debating of the issues, only poll numbers and vacuous overtures, that to my mind, come off as mating calls to the poll-driven zombies.

Good post, Cal. I will be sure to drop a few lines to ACM and I encourage others to do the same.

* If you have an extra moment drop a few lines to Medved over at TH explaining to him that he doesn’t know Shinola from that other stuff. :)

[NRA2BFree]

That’s a lot of good information. Thanks for taking the time to get it all together! Candidates can’t lie and get away with it because their quotes tell the truth. For too long now, we’ve kept electing RINOS because they would change their platform and say what we all wanted them to say. This is the reason the GOP is in the trouble it’s in today. We’ve got to elect people with a record that doesn’t need sanitizing. That said, after reading these quotes people should know that Duncan Hunter is the ONLY candidate who qualifies to be President!!

[AmericanInTokyo]

DUNCAN HUNTER IS NO DOUBT MY CHOICE.

HE is by far the best.

On Illegal Alien issues, of course Tancredo and Paul are excellent, too, so in fairness we should give a shout out to their supporters as well. But those other assorted "top tier" RINOs and other yahoos definitely should be kept as far away from the GOP nomination as possible, on this issue alone!!

[Guenevere]

bttt

[Old 300]

I think America is in danger of being Californicated by these RINOs.

[Brandie]

Bookmarked, this is excellent, thank you.

[babyfreep]

Duncan Hunter ping

[mnehring]

I’m sure you are aware of this, but for Thompson at least, two of these items are incorrectly referenced (probably because they were taken from NumbersUSA).. First, Thompson voted against S1664, NumbersUSA falsely has him listed as voting for this because he voted for moving it from one committee to another during the edit process, not giving him credit for the main vote on the bill. Second, it ignores that Thompson co-sponsored a competing amendment to the Exon amendment that was worded almost exactly the same but it didn’t have the exceptions that the Exon amendment has (it never made it to vote because Exon passed). The quotes are also hacked up, but I’m sure you are aware of this.

Based on this quick observation, I would suggest that anyone who supports any candidate check these bills/numbers and not blindly follow what is listed here. There is a LOT of bad information going around on all the candidates.