[Balt]

I like how Craig’s water carriers like to mention only the toe tapping and not the hand under the partition into the stall where the cop was.

A good point, but part of my point was: How do we know there was a hand under the partition? Because the cop says so? That's not good enough for me.

[PeterPrinciple]

A good point, but part of my point was: How do we know there was a hand under the partition? Because the cop says so? That’s not good enough for me.

---

How about the fact that he pled guilty?

[Lurking Libertarian]

A good point, but part of my point was: How do we know there was a hand under the partition? Because the cop says so? That's not good enough for me.

How about, because he pled guilty? That good enough for you?

[dmz]

How do we know there was a hand under the partition? Because the cop says so? That’s not good enough for me.
____________

OK. Fair enough.

So is it anytime that there is only one eyewitness to a crime that you doubt the eyewitness, or only when it is a cop, or only when an allegedly conservative senator is in the crosshairs?