Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Reagan Man
You won't take a partial victory even when a total victory is not possible. Strange.

A) You won't overturn Roe without arguing for the personhood of the unborn.

B) Even if you did, you would still be left with a situation in which the personhood of the unborn is unrecognized.

C) Such a scenario makes it difficult to overturn abortion in the several states.

D) Such a scenario makes another Roe possible at any given point in time.

92 posted on 08/28/2007 3:52:47 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (States' rights don't trump God-given, unalienable rights...support the Reagan pro-life platform)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]


To: EternalVigilance
The USSC had no business legislating from the bench and making law in the case of abortion rights, based on some privacy concern. Reagan said: "Make no mistake, abortion-on-demand is not a right granted by the Constitution."

Roe was an activist ruling. J.White said it was, "an act of raw judicial power". If the High Court found that life begins at conception, then all bets are off. Thats what you want to see happen. I'd be overjoyed too. For now, lets use a little practical wisdom.

95 posted on 08/28/2007 4:10:46 PM PDT by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson