Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: pissant
Life is not a states right issue if you understand the unborn to be human beings...So you define all those who see the unborn as human lives as activists?

I want federalists who will uphold the Constitution and determine if laws presented to them are consistent with such. I don't want an activist reading even if I agree with the end result. It just means activists of a different slant can tilt it back the other way next time.

45 posted on 08/28/2007 2:41:47 PM PDT by dirtboy (Chertoff needs to move out of DC, not move to Justice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: dirtboy

No truly “federalist” position calls for the alienation of the God-given rights to life and liberty by any individual or state.

Hence my tagline...


47 posted on 08/28/2007 2:47:09 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (States' rights don't trump God-given, unalienable rights...support the Reagan pro-life platform)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: dirtboy

I do not share your view of what constitutes an activist. I am not one. But I know very well, for a fact, that my children were human beings long before they left my wifes womb. As such it is not activism to think they deserve constitutional protection based on the 5th and 14th amendments.

I want federalists too. But I want those who understand that our right to life comes from God the Father. George Washington, James Madison, Thomas Jefferson and Ben Franklin would approve. Federalism is great when talking about things not mentioned in the constitution. Those are reserved to the states.


52 posted on 08/28/2007 2:52:32 PM PDT by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson