They DO NOT want a strong conservative to win our Primary, as they KNOW he would win in as big a landslide as Reagan did. They know a lot of strong conservative voters will not be inspired to get out and vote for any of their top 3. Oh a lot will, but the base will not be inspired, and the DBM doesn’t want them to be. Don’t kid yourself, and do not allow the DBM to determine who the GOP will nominate.
“If the DBM refuses to give us the truth on any multitude of issues, what would possibly make you think they would give any news on Hunter?”
I’m not sure that that qualifies as a good argument for supporting Mr. Hunter - that he’s unable to break through a media conspiracy to silence him.
“They DO NOT want a strong conservative to win our Primary, as they KNOW he would win in as big a landslide as Reagan did.”
I don’t think that Mr. Hunter would win in a landslide. I think he could win (and in the unlikely event that he wins the nomination, I think he very well could lose, too), but I don’t really believe that he’s the strongest candidate that the party could nominate.
There may be a reason why he’s served nearly three decades in the House of Representative and yet had very low name recognition. That reason may relate to his ability to win a national campaign.
My own personal judgment - not the media’s judgment - leads me to conclude that Mr. Thompson would be a better candidate and a better president. Not a more conservative president, but one who will be better able to get elected and better able to implement a moderately-conservative agenda once elected.
sitetest