Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: ontap

He’s also on record waffling about what that means. He said that Buzzy Ginsburg could be considered a strict constructionist. Rudy’s promises in this area are meaningless.

Rudy winning the presidency would be the end of the conservative movement in this country for generations. Romney is the same deal, but more stealthy. I won’t vote for either of them.

Elections are battles and movements are wars. I will NOT lose a war to win a battle under any circumstances.


162 posted on 07/23/2007 8:13:16 AM PDT by perfect_rovian_storm (Do you think Ron Paul supporters worked the poll?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]


To: perfect_rovian_storm

The court is the main concern in the next election. And if the choice comes down to Rudy or Hillary I’m not going to throw up my hands and cede it to her. I’m going to do what ever I can to get more conservative justices. Rudy might renig on his promise given! I know damn well Hillary won’t renig on hers. This purist crap gets us deeper the hole. Justices last thirty years or longer.


175 posted on 07/23/2007 8:24:34 AM PDT by ontap (Just another backstabbing conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson