Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins; P-Marlowe
Trial lawyers could go after those who advocate deadly behavior, couldn’t they?

On what theory? Cigarettes were actionable because of products liability. Sexuality is not usually a product.

31 posted on 07/07/2007 2:06:24 PM PDT by jude24 (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: jude24; P-Marlowe

See post #21. Help me make this into a theory. I’ve got gobs of cash, and you’ll get $350 per hour during the brainstorming, and a 50% cut of the take with a guaranteed minimum.

I want you to help me get there.

How do we do it, counselor?


32 posted on 07/07/2007 2:18:36 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain And Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: jude24; xzins
On what theory? Cigarettes were actionable because of products liability. Sexuality is not usually a product.

Negligence. Sexuality can damage a person as much as cigarettes. Indeed, if a parishoner were to get herpes or AIDS or Hepatitis C after being seduced by a sexual predator who had been encouraged to practice his lifestyle with other members of the congregation, then liability could attach.

I'm sure there is a fact pattern that could produce a viable lawsuit. Let's find a damaged parishoner and then see if we can find a legal theory. Generally where there are damages, there is a remedy.

41 posted on 07/07/2007 2:56:50 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson