[beezdotcom]

Here's the problem with what you've presented - if Warren says that he disagrees with the parts you have correctly pointed out as missing from these incomplete statements of faith, then you have a case. Otherwise, it's really hard to prove the negative.

I guess my sticking point is that we've successfully used some of Warren's materials, and have not even ATTEMPTED to paint them as a complete summary of doctrine. We've used them as helpful aids for presenting one small facet of Christian doctrine. It never even OCCURS to us to lean on them as a complete treatise on Christian theology - and if Warren intends them as such, it's news to me.

[Blogger]

Pragmatism does not excuse a biblically incoherent underlying premise.