Replies

No, I decided that I'm not going to end this on a flippant remark, however deserved.

You seem to want me to do all the legwork of presenting your argument. Friend, a charge such as yours, made by a faceless stranger, in the context of a rather yawn-inducing article, warrants about five minutes of my personal attention - ten if I'm greatly familiar with your work. I've spent twice that, and I've found no more of substance than:

RW is in danger of leading a personality cult (duh!),
PD is splitting churches (and the splits seem to be more about methods than doctrine), and
PD methods are BAD (but that's rather viewpoint-driven, since some of the PD methods of rebuke that upset people are entirely valid if dealing with someone who is acting heretically or disruptively to the body. The disagreement appears to be over who interprets 'disruptive'.)

In the time invested so far, that's what I've found. Sorry I'm apparently not as skilled as you are.

If you truly believe in what you're saying, then you should be ready to convince others, have the information at hand, and cheerfully be willing to post it. Short of that, it's not much use tossing around charges.

I have not called anyone on here an idiot. Yet, I was called an “evil one” for daring to bring the subject up - again by someone who evidentally hasn’t done any research on the subject. Nevertheless, I am not here to fight, but to inform or at least raise the warning flag. What you all do with it is on your account.