Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: rob21
The statements ARE pro-abortion. There is no way for them to be construed otherwise.

They're not. THEY ARE SIMPLY NOT PRO-ABORTION. Fred still believed that there should be no government money for abortions, that there should be parental consent, and the issue returned to the states (reversing Roe vs Wade). At that time, that is as pro-life as you're going to get.

Now I can see that you are trying really hard to get me banned or something, but how can you keep accusing me of lying about his record?

LYING ABOUT HIS RECORD IS AGAINST THE RULES HERE? WHAT PART OF THAT DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND?

I have never claimed that he has a pro-choice voting record, I only claimed that he made pro-choice statements in the past, which is true.

But why are you so focused on statements made when his voting record and current statements say otherwise?

"You got nothing. NOTHING!"

85 posted on 06/24/2007 10:05:50 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]


To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

“But why are you so focused on statements made when his voting record and current statements say otherwise?”

Ummm... maybe because I’M NOT A FREDBOT! Past statements by Fred Thompson actually matter to me because I am not obsessed with promoting Fred! All of your hysteria can not hide the simple fact that this quote WILL matter to people who are undecided.


93 posted on 06/24/2007 10:12:20 AM PDT by rob21 (Duncan Hunter 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson