Replies

No. You are wrong again. There was no Z visa proposal when Romney made his prior statements. The Z visa confers immediate LEGAL status within 24 hours. Mitt's statement does not endorse giving immediate legal status within 24 hours to anyone like the McCain plan intends.

Of course, everyone supports some kind of immigration reform. Nobody in their right mind supports the Z visa, however. It's a deal breaker.

Plus, I was talking about his ACTUAL record which is the best indicator of future actions. He was tough on illegal immigration issues while governor, but you conveniently ignore that and go back to old statements taken out of context which do not actually refer to the specific legislation being proposed NOW.

You can have the last word, as I see you are unreasonable and firmly anti-Mitt. So be it.

No. You are wrong again. There was no Z visa proposal when Romney made his prior statements.

My statement was that Mitt was for amnesty before he was against it. Even prior to z-visas, McCain's bill was amnesty - and Mitt praised it.

You truly are shameless. Just admit it. Mitt flip-flopped on this issue. Which isn't even that big a deal - I'm glad he's on board - but quit pretending that he wasn't for amnesty as soon as 2005.

You can have the last word, as I see you are unreasonable and firmly anti-Mitt. So be it.

I see it is now unreasonable to go back to a position a candidate held less than two years ago to refute YOUR OWN STATEMENTS.

If that is unreasonable to you, you really should change your political affiliation to Democrat, because that's how they function.