Did you even read rob21’s posts?
He conceded that Fred had a pro-life record. He was troubled by past pro-choice statements.
If anything, post #53 was more out of line than rob21.
Yeah I read them, and I'm not buying his male bovine feces.
Imagine if somebody did this same thing to Hunter. Imagine that they found some statement that he might not even have penned, that his local right to life orgs say couldn't possibly reflect his true views, yet there it is in black and white. "I think the government has no role in the abortion decision" or something like that, with Duncan Hunter's name on it. And then said blowhard says "Gee, I know he has a pro-life record, but I'm so very concerned by these pro-life statements. After all, he might just be pandering to his district and we'll se a different guy in the White House." And then imagine when people tell him that it's dumb to doubt Hunter on pro-life issues, he starts whining that he's being oppressed, and that he's not being allowed to question the great Duncan.
Would you tolerate that crap? I wouldn't, and I don't think we should tolerate it just because the guy who did it likes Hunter. Oh, and if the abortion example doesn't get my point across, imagine some slime using a picture of Hunter and Duke Cunningham acting chummy as an excuse to express is "deep concerns" that Hunter might have been involved in bribery. I wouldn't tolerate that crap, either.