[Ultra Sonic 007]

Read post #53 to see what upsdriver is talking about. That kind of talk is just not cool.

[perfect_rovian_storm]

Agreed, but it is the first time I’ve seen anything like it from any Fred Thompson supporter. I think it should have been removed, but that’s not my call.

After this slanderous thread was started (by an angry Duncan Hunter supporter), it does seem kind of disingenuous to paint Fred Thompson supporters with such a broad brush over a single response, no?

[AnnaZ]

The post (#53) was nonsensical.

But the poster didn't start a thread touting a decade+ old statement to attempt to back it up.

The issue with this thread, and it's originator, is that this topic has been tossed around ad nauseum already. When NRTL invites Romney or Giuliani to speak to them, get back to me. Otherwise, this issue should be taken up with the org... Thompson's clearly pro-life enough for them.

If pristine pro-life street cred is one's sole candidate-choosing litmus test, vote your conscience. There are plenty of other issues on the table as well. Hunter may be one's ideal candidate, and therefore one should be working to bring him visibility and viability, not trashing fellow travellers whose support would eventually be needed were that work to be successful.