Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalVigilance

And YOUR idea will save NO babies, because you will take nothing but an immediate end to abortion, which won’t happen.

I’ll take saving as many babies as possible, over demanding something impossible.


256 posted on 06/24/2007 11:33:47 PM PDT by Politicalmom ("Mom, I'll be old enough to vote for Fred when he runs for his second term." -My Son. (I'm proud))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies ]


To: Politicalmom

Well, in your scenario, and that of Thompson, Romney and Giuliani, if babies are not persons with a God-given and unalienable right to life, there is not even any basis for overturning Roe to begin with, much less outlawing it in any of the several states.

However, if they are persons, as common sense, science, and morality dictate, then Roe goes, and so does every abortion in America, because those persons are persons as defined by the Fourteenth Amendment, as even the judges who decided Roe admitted in their infamous decision.


260 posted on 06/24/2007 11:38:52 PM PDT by EternalVigilance ("You will have your bipartisanship." - Fred Thompson, May 4, 2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies ]

To: Politicalmom
I’ll take saving as many babies as possible, over demanding something impossible.

What is impossible is overturning Roe without a determination that babies are persons, and are therefore endowed by their Creator with an unalienable right to live.

262 posted on 06/24/2007 11:43:51 PM PDT by EternalVigilance ("You will have your bipartisanship." - Fred Thompson, May 4, 2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson