So then why do the high and mighty fredbots spam Duncan Hunter threads with “he’s unelectable”, “he should be Freds VP”, and the classic “Duncan Who”? Could it be because they are trying to prop up their less than stellar conservative?
I think Fred is not only BETTER, but he will be a MORE EFFECTIVE CONSERVATIVE LEADER, that Hunter would be even if elected.
Pointing out lack of electability is not like trying to drive a wedge between you and you guy with dubious “news.”
“Or, because we don’t want our standard bearer to be an ineffectual communicator who has demonstrated a lack of ability to LEAD and PERSUADE people, and who would lose to the Dem, even if we all agreed to support him as you wish.”
Are you nuts? Whenever Duncan Hunter is given the opportunity, he always impresses people. The problem is that the MSM won’t give him any air time. They would rather focus on the big RINOs: Giuliani, McCain, Romney, and Thompson.
And what makes you think that he would lose to the rat nominee? If the American people are given a choice between a solid, patriotic conservative and someone like the beast or Hussein Osama, they will choose the conservative.
“I think Fred is not only BETTER, but he will be a MORE EFFECTIVE CONSERVATIVE LEADER, that Hunter would be even if elected.”
Unless he decides to betray us again, like he did with McCain-Feingold...