Oh come on. If a govt has to make people do what they would otherwise not do then that govt has to enforce it. In this instance, to make abortion illegal. That is work and work costs money. As I said, if a state wants to enforce any social/religious agenda and pay the money to do so and it turns out to attract more businesses and people there and it evolves into a more harmonious community then God bless them. Lets try it at the state lever first. Any federal wide enforcement of anything costs people money, time and effort outside of their day to day path of least resistance. That cost will be paid for by the tax on the “fruits of your/mine/their labor”. That is a cost. I don’t deny its a cost sometimes worth paying but lets try any social con measure at a state level first. When it gains enough popularity across enough states then maybe we can put it up for an amendment to the constitution. In the meantime, if you try to impose your social/religious agenda on the federal govt then you are a utopianist as bad as the socialists. Remember they want to house, feed, cloth, and provide heathcare to the poor through the federal govt. Sounds pretty moral to me.
You don't sound like someone who wants to rebuild a coalition. You sound like someone who wants to bully some people into voting how you tell them to.