[sofaman]

FYI...many of the WA'ers are folks that we all talked to for years before they were summarily banned. The gnashing of teeth took place here, not there.

You seem to think that all WA'ers are Rudy supporters, which they're not. Many are Fred supporters, but that didn't occur to you, apparently.

Probably because you were too busy taking a cheapshot at folks that aren't here to defend themselves.

You really should be ashamed.

[jellybean]

Who are all these Fred suppoters who’ve gone over to WA?? I know one, Howlin, who is over there.

[Politicalmom]

Actually, I am referring to several of them who were virulently anti-Fred, who said he was a “stalking horse” and would never run. Maybe you should get some facts before you go nuts. I don’t feel the least bit “ashamed”. Most of them opused or cursed out Jim until they got banned. Besides, they bash FR on their “super secret” thread all the time.

[dixiechick2000]

FWIW, there weren’t that many who were banned outright.
Many of the banned folks asked to have their accounts deleted.

In fact, a lot of the folks there are still able to post here.

Some do...

...but most choose not to.

[Petronski]

FYI...many of the WA'ers are folks that we all talked to for years before they were summarily banned.

Summarily banned?

Please.

[wagglebee]

Well, if you take a glance over there, many of the WAckos are bashing Fred left and right.

But then again, since there is a “sofaman” over at the WAcko site who was “last active” 10 hours ago, but who last made a PUBLIC comment two DAYS AGO, maybe the feelings are different about Fred on the closed threads.

[codercpc]

Help me out, what is a WA’er?

Thanks