Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: drzz

“It’s a betrayal.”

Enough. In regards to F. Benteen. You are slandering/smearing the name of a man who served OUR country, bravely, for 30 years. Decorated, oft-promoted, he was know for his courage in battle.
You have some desire to defend Custer, fine. Stop slandering brave soldiers.
Pimp your blog/book/videos elsewhere.


60 posted on 05/10/2007 10:56:39 AM PDT by gate2wire (Street Sense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: gate2wire

“he was know for his courage in battle.”
know=known


61 posted on 05/10/2007 10:58:14 AM PDT by gate2wire (Street Sense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

To: gate2wire

Hey,

Benteen and Reno didn’t support their troops in the middle of battle.

Being soldiers don’t save them of military rules. What about the 210 men on the hill, surrounded by enemies ? What about Custer, who draw a battle plan and was, after his death, tarnished and tarnished again because 2/3 of his regiment wasn’t in the battle ?

Benteen betrayed 210 soldiers and left them behind without supporting them.

“Reno proved incompetent and Benteen showed his indifference – I will not use the uglier words that have often been in my mind. Both failed Custer and he had to fight it alone.”
Private William Taylor, 7th cavalry, February 20, 1910


62 posted on 05/10/2007 11:02:00 AM PDT by drzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson