Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

There is quite a variation between high and low numbers, but what is important to me is when Solar Cycle 24 actually begins. It has not yet; in fact, sun spot 953 is just rolling into view.
1 posted on 04/25/2007 7:05:14 PM PDT by Excellence
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Excellence

What is the significance out of curiosity?


2 posted on 04/25/2007 7:06:44 PM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Excellence
http://www.sec.noaa.gov/SolarCycle/SC24/index.htmlApril 25, 2007 Solar Cycle 24 Prediction presentations at the SEC Space Weather Workshop Solar Cycle 24 Consensus Prediction (PPT) – Douglas Biesecker, NOAA, SEC Societal and Economic Aspects of Space Weather (PPT) – Daniel Baker, LASP/University of Colorado Meeting the Challenges of Nature: The Impact of Space Weather on Marine Positioning Services (PPT) – Richard Barker, Fugro Chance Inc Why NASA Needs a Prediction of the Solar Cycle (PPT) – W. Dean Pesnell, NASA GSFC The Sun's Role in Past, Current and Future Climate Change – Caspar Ammann, NCAR CGD & HAO

Interesting that there is no link for Caspar Amman's thoughts on The Sun's Role in Climate Change.

Ammann and Eugene Wahl of Alfred University have analyzed the Mann-Bradley-Hughes (MBH) climate field reconstruction and reproduced the MBH results using their own computer code. They found the MBH method is robust even when numerous modifications are employed. Their results appear in two new research papers submitted for review to the journals Geophysical Research Letters and Climatic Change. The authors invite researchers and others to use the code for their own evaluation of the method. Ammann and Wahl’s findings contradict an assertion by McIntyre and McKitrick that 15th century global temperatures rival those of the late 20th century and therefore make the hockey stick-shaped graph inaccurate. They also dispute McIntyre and McKitrick’s alleged identification of a fundamental flaw that would significantly bias the MBH climate reconstruction toward a hockey stick shape. Ammann and Wahl conclude that the highly publicized criticisms of the MBH graph are unfounded. They first presented their detailed analyses at the American Geophysical Union’s Fall Meeting in San Francisco last December and at the American Association of Geographers Annual Meeting in Denver this year.

And he is a believer in the hockey stick theory.

8 posted on 04/25/2007 7:21:12 PM PDT by Excellence (Three million years is enough! Stop cyclical climate change now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ancient_geezer

Thought you might want to see this


9 posted on 04/26/2007 1:50:05 AM PDT by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric cartman voice* ?I love you guys?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson