I call the government trying to maintain a SAFE and orderly society good government.
Now, if you want to give up all your rights when you leave your home stoned, draw up the Constitutional Amendment and I’ll vote for it. I have ZERO tolerance for people who endanger/negatively impact the lives of everyone else because they want to get high.
Can you give me a single example of a liberal nanny-state law or program that wasn't "trying to maintain a safe and orderly society"? If that's your criteria for "good government" then by your reconing, the Chinese should have a much better government than we do. Classic fallacy of over-simplification.
Now, if you want to give up all your rights when you leave your home stoned, draw up the Constitutional Amendment and I’ll vote for it. I have ZERO tolerance for people who endanger/negatively impact the lives of everyone else because they want to get high.
You said earlier it didn't matter to you what other people do in their homes. Are we talking about what people do in privacy of their own homes, what they do in public, or just trying to have it both ways?