Thompson is on record saying the Roe vs. wade is bad law and bad science. Nobody who supports abortion in the first trimester is going to say those two things. Meanwhile, Rudy has called RvW good law.
Once again, I'm wondering why the Rudy supporters consider their candidate's hardcore pro-abort position to be a plus or not worth talking about, but are so eager to "catch" his opponents in the sin of being less than rabidly pro-life. Perhaps y'all instinctively realize that your guy is pretty much the definition of a pro-abortion extremist.
Well, then you won't have any trouble citing a recent quote from Fred in which he unambiguously opposes first trimester abortion. So until you find that statement, his 13 year old quote is valid since he hasn't explicitly repudiated it.
Once again, I'm wondering why the Rudy supporters consider their candidate's hardcore pro-abort position to be a plus or not worth talking about,
You obviously can't be talking about me. I don't consider it a plus at all. I don't like it. Rudy has his problem, no question about it. But he doesn't deny it nor does he pander to a silver of the base with some phony story about being pro-choice for the first trimester but pro-life for the next 6 months of pregnancy.
Saying that Roe vs. Wade is bad law and bad science doesn't refute his 13 year old statement that "Government should stay out of it. No public financing. The ultimate decision must be made by the woman. Government should treat its citizens as adults capable of making moral decisions on their own."