Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Quite an act: Fred Thompson has lifted spirits of many in the Republican Party
CourierPress/Scripps Howard News Service ^ | 3-22-07 | Dan Thomasson

Posted on 03/22/2007 12:20:50 PM PDT by STARWISE

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
Run, Fred, run!!


1 posted on 03/22/2007 12:20:54 PM PDT by STARWISE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jellybean; onyx; Howlin; Sturm Ruger; Politicalmom; rintense; Txsleuth; SE Mom

FRedheads .. PING !


2 posted on 03/22/2007 12:22:02 PM PDT by STARWISE (They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Boy...I sure don't like reading he was a good friend of Hagel.

You don't suppose he would pick Hagel as a running mate, do you??? UGH


3 posted on 03/22/2007 12:27:36 PM PDT by Txsleuth (I don'tuH know who I am voting for yet...just window shopping.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

He's sure generating a lot of interest and excitement!


4 posted on 03/22/2007 12:29:17 PM PDT by onyx (DEFEAT Hillary Clinton, Marxist, student of Saul Alinsky & ally and beneficiary of Soros.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Please add me to the ping list.

And I wish Fred would just run!

It is interesting to note that every single major Republican nominee was attacked in the article, associated with a 'bad point' and not one 'good point' to any of them. Drive by media at their best.


5 posted on 03/22/2007 12:30:50 PM PDT by kingu (No, I don't use sarcasm tags - it confuses people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

I'm not going to get excited or even speculate about a man who hasn't committed and officially entered the race.


6 posted on 03/22/2007 12:34:35 PM PDT by Elyse (I refuse to feed the crocodile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kingu; jellybean; Howlin

Jelly and Howlin are keeping the ping lists .. ;) Go to it,
guys !


7 posted on 03/22/2007 12:36:38 PM PDT by STARWISE (They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

Dearlord, NO .. I would pray that would NEVER EVER happen. That would be abyssmal ..simply frightening.


8 posted on 03/22/2007 12:38:57 PM PDT by STARWISE (They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
John McCain's former stature as the man to beat has slipped because of his support for more troops in Iraq.

Well, if that's what the author wants to believe, I suppose it's okay...

Being the subject of a recall movement in your own state should count for something, though.

9 posted on 03/22/2007 12:41:10 PM PDT by HiJinx (Ask me about Troop Support...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

From the piece you posted:

"Whether or not he possesses the desire, money and organization to capture the nomination and then the White House against odds that at this stage clearly favor whoever wins the Democratic nod is another question."

This is clearly the conventional wisdom in the MSM- the libs will take POTUS in 08.

Unbelievable, isn't it?

Run, Fred, RUN!!!


10 posted on 03/22/2007 12:46:27 PM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
John McCain's former stature as the man to beat has slipped because of his support for more troops in Iraq.

Yeah, that's it.

11 posted on 03/22/2007 1:18:12 PM PDT by dinasour (Pajamahadeen, SnowFlake, and Eeevil Doer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
John McCain's former stature as the man to beat has slipped because of his support for more troops in Iraq.

The writer sounded sane right up to this sentence.

12 posted on 03/22/2007 1:21:41 PM PDT by Sloth (The GOP is to DemonRats in politics as Michael Jackson is to Jeffrey Dahmer in babysitting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sloth
(I believe he's 6" 6")

Our first foot-long president!

13 posted on 03/22/2007 1:23:27 PM PDT by Silly (plasticpie.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dinasour; Sloth

Yep .. he sure leaked out his little bias: for abandoning our troops.


14 posted on 03/22/2007 1:23:37 PM PDT by STARWISE (They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kingu; Howlin
Please add me to the ping list.

The FRedhead list grows longer. :)

15 posted on 03/22/2007 1:26:39 PM PDT by jellybean (FRED THOMPSON FOR PRESIDENT! Proud to be an Ann-droid and a Steyn-aholic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Silly; STARWISE

In FDT's 1975 book, "At That Point In Time," Fred writes that he is 6'5".


16 posted on 03/22/2007 1:33:30 PM PDT by Graymatter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
John McCain's former stature as the man to beat has slipped because of his support for more troops in Iraq.

BS. McCain's stature has slipped because he is a raving lunatic that co-sponsored the CFR restrictions on free speech, colluded with the democrats and his "gang of 14" to keep judicial filibusters in place, and undermined W's initiatives from tax cuts to private social security investment accounts at every opportunity. In terms of the GOP nomination, supporting more troops in Iraq in an effort to ensure and achieve victory is about the only positive thing you can say about him.

17 posted on 03/22/2007 1:54:08 PM PDT by VRWCmember (Go Rudy Go! (And take McCain with you!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
Part of the equation may be the "Hagel factor." Nebraska Sen. Charles Hagel, a Vietnam veteran who is a hard nosed opponent of the Iraq policy and often mentioned as a potentially viable alternative for Republican moderates. He still hadn't made up his mind.

Hagel is a non-starter that might not even be able to win the GOP primary for his own senate seat if he were up for reelection.

18 posted on 03/22/2007 1:55:30 PM PDT by VRWCmember (Go Rudy Go! (And take McCain with you!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: spacekicker; onyx; jellybean; Sturm Ruger; Howlin; Politicalmom; Txsleuth; SE Mom; Mo1; Peach; ...
Okay!

FRED THOMPSON'S ENTIRE SEGMENT ON LAURA INGRAHAM YESTERDAY - HE'S FANTASTIC!

But, for the first time since hearing of his potential candidacy, hearing him talk about his personal considerations ... family, money, etc., I'm sensing that he could be convinced not to. I can understand, but my heart kinda sunk.

20 posted on 03/22/2007 4:41:17 PM PDT by STARWISE (They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson