Posted on 03/21/2007 6:12:37 AM PDT by pissant
Representative Duncan Hunter sparked my interest when he announced that he was throwing his hat into the ring and run for president on the GOP ticket. The Duncan Hunter '08 website did an excellent job of defining his core values and beliefs in the areas of the war in Iraq, terrorism, taxes, abortion and the like, but had scant information on his views of gun rights and the Second Amendment.
So what's a blogger to do other than get in contact with his campaign staff and request an interview?
After correspondence back and forth, and a bit of time to allow Representative Hunter's staff to vet both myself and my blog, he agreed.
An interview (via email) with presidential candidate Duncan Hunter.
Thank you for taking the time to answer the following firearm related questions. The Second Amendment, the right to keep and bear arms, and firearms issues in general are not addressed on your campaign web site so folks are interested in your views on these issues.
(DH in quotes)“Thank you for the opportunity to address these vital issues of liberty with you. Our website was put together piece by piece and the Second Amendment statement was one of the later things added. That does not reflect the slightest lack of commitment on my part regarding Second Amendment rights. My record over 26 years in Congress is absolutely clear.”
1. Please state, in your own words, what the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States means to you. Do you understand the right to keep and bear arms to be an individual or a collective right?
“The right to keep and bear arms is an absolute right of Americans to protect their families and their communities and their nation with firearms. In this age of post-911, Americans, I believe are comforted by the fact that our ability to resist terrorism is not limited to law enforcement or defense agencies but is also within the ability of all gun-owning Americans.”
2. There has been a lot of discussion in the media and in the legislature about “Closing the Gun Show Loophole.” What is your definition of a “Gun Show Loophole”, and how would you address this issue?
“I reject the term ‘loophole’. It is a clever verbal device of the left to restrict the rights of Americans. Constitutional rights are not loopholes in governmental regulations. As President, I would veto legislation that would require a background check on private firearms transactions at gun shows or any other bill that restricts the Second Amendment Rights of American.”
3. Representative Carolyn McCarthy has introduced H.B. 1022, the Assault Weapons Ban and law Enforcement Protection Act of 2007. Do you believe that Americans have the right to own, use and carry weapons of military pattern? Do you support restricting a citizen’s access to firearms based upon cosmetics or ease of function?
“As President, I would veto any bill that reauthorizes the semi-auto ban that was sunset in 2004. These types of bills represent “feel good” measures that impede the rights of law-abiding citizens by banning guns based not on facts but based largely upon how scary they look.”
4. In Congress, you represent the great state of California, a state applauded by some and demonized by others for having extremely restrictive gun control laws. Do you understand California’s gun control laws to be a necessary and effective deterrent to violent crime?
“Gun control laws directed at law-abiding citizens are not a crime deterrent. In fact, studies show that private ownership of firearms by Americans reduces crime. You and I both know that the one thing criminals prefer more than any other is unarmed victims.”
5. If you are elected President of the United States, how would your presidency affect firearm owners?
“As President, I will not sign any treaty that impedes, in any way, the Second Amendment rights of Americans.
Only judges who have a demonstrated commitment to interpret the Constitution as our founders intended will be nominated to the federal bench.
I would ask Congress to send me for my signature, legislation to repeal the D.C. gun ban, legislation to allow reciprocity among states with concealed carry rights and other pieces of legislation to restore rights that prior administrations have eroded.
In fact, I authored the Hunter amendment, Rol call 241 in 1999, to allow DC residents to keep and bear arms.”
Representative Hunter; thank you again for taking time out of your busy day to answer these questions and address issues that many Americans see as important. Your voting history on Second Amendment issues is appreciated.
Respectfully,
JR
There it is, Duncan Hunter on the Second Amendment. Since this was an interview, I'll leave my thoughts to myself for the time being.
I am very thankful to Representative Hunter for taking the time to answer these questions. I hope the questions were sufficient to give you information you can use in making a decision in the Republican primaries.
Most Rudy supporters are Republicans who are more interested in getting their party back into power than to find someone who is actually willing to stand up and do what is right.
That's my observed opinion.
There is vast chasm between those who consider themselves conservatives first and those who fancy themselves republicans first.
Amen brother, Amen
Only judges who have a demonstrated commitment to interpret the Constitution as our founders intended will be nominated to the federal bench.
I would ask Congress to send me for my signature, legislation to repeal the D.C. gun ban, legislation to allow reciprocity among states with concealed carry rights and other pieces of legislation to restore rights that prior administrations have eroded.
In fact, I authored the Hunter amendment, Rol call 241 in 1999, to allow DC residents to keep and bear arms.”
Would Hunter sign/support legislation repealing the '34, '68 '87 gun control acts and reverse (on day one) the executive order banning the importation of certain "assault weapons".
Duncan Hunter is a breath of fresh air with his "straight with no chaser" answers!!
Well, I'd support him as mayor of NYC...but that's only because the city is so messed up that there's little bad he'd do that isn't already being done (even more true when Dinkins was Mayor). He was worlds of improvement over what was going on then, and the city government thoroughly needed some elbows thrown around. That said, he's inappropriate for Presidential office.
BTTT
I thank Representative Hunter for being an articulate and forthright spokesman in defending our right to keep and bear arms.
"I support Hunter first, but would also support Thompson or Gingrich, but JulieAnnie and the other two would drive me to a third party. They will never get my vote unless they made radical about faces and even then I wouldn't trust them."
This statement that you made above is the number one reason that I think Guiliani, McCain or Romney will lose if they are the nominee. People will only be able to trust them if they show thier true sides, and most will not like them if they do that.
Gingrich has baggage, but he also has name recognition. I think he could win inspite of his baggage because he shows his true identity. People can trust him. Thompson is a good man. I have looked at this votes and I see no reason to say anything against him.
Hunter has 4 things going for him at the moment. 1. Unlike Gingrich or Thompson, he has announced. 2. No baggage. 3. Consistent conservative voting record. 4. The type and amount of legislation he has written over the years.
I see what you mean about this man.
Duncan Hunter for President 2008!
It will probably take an act of biblical proportion to get this guy on the news though.
>That would certainly help if we had something like that to send out.<
If such an inclusive document would materialize, please let us know. We Duncan Hunter supporters have contacts in many states which could make good use of such a document. Thank you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.