Skip to comments.
Victoria's Secret ~~ Libby Trial Deliberations: 3-1-07
firedoglake.com ^
| 3-1-07
| Empty Wheel
Posted on 03/01/2007 7:22:18 AM PST by STARWISE
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-132 last
To: STARWISE
To add a gloss of legitimacy, Ms. Toensing erroneously cites the law as requiring the covert agent to have had a foreign assignment, then concludes that Valerie was not stationed overseas.Nice try.
Yeah, Ms. Toensing was only one of the staffers who WROTE the friggin law - - firedoglake certainly would know better than her.
To: STARWISE
Thanks for the updates.
I posted earlier that the jury should be sequestered this weekend, IMHO..
I can't believe that judge would NOT answer their question about what a word "meant" because of the time...AFTER telling them they can't look at a dictionary.
How many people would bet money they don't ALL look it up this weekend???
I betcha we end up losing another juror over this...and they will have to start all over with an alternate.
To: onyx
Hi sweet you!!!
I am so sorry that you are still on a rice diet...that has to be getting old.
I have been praying for you...and missing you!!
sleuth
To: STARWISE
In response to a couple of upthread questions:
1) The jurors have been brought to and from the courthouse from a central location by the marshalls in a special van every day.
2)The standard procedure is that no juror is ever allowed a dictionary or other non-record reference materials. If they have a question it is to be posed to the judge who after consulation w/ counsel and on the record provides an answer to the inquiry.
To: Txsleuth
((( sleuth ))) I am starting to really appreciate and like rice. :0) Off to eat some now.
125
posted on
03/01/2007 3:11:16 PM PST
by
onyx
(DEFEAT Hillary Clinton, Marxist, student of Saul Alinsky & ally and beneficiary of Soros.)
To: the Real fifi
Thanks for answers.
Re 1) I was not sure if it were SOP (you confirmed it is) or a courtesy by judge due to bad weather condition in DC - I had no problems with either.
Re 2) Do they like their juries "barefoot and pregnant", too? Or afraid they might learn something [new] by looking in the dictionary? Sheesh.
126
posted on
03/01/2007 3:20:32 PM PST
by
CutePuppy
(If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
To: CutePuppy
It is not to keep people stupid--it is to make certain that all the jurors are working on the same basis of information and that that basis is in the record. Some words like "reasonable doubt" and "material" have specific legal meaning and it is important that everyone understand what that meaning if,
To: the Real fifi
Yeah, I thought there maybe some legal dictionary with definitions translated from legalese to English, so everyone would work off of the same definitions.
The line about jurors "not dressed for court" was precious, I thought.
128
posted on
03/01/2007 3:59:39 PM PST
by
CutePuppy
(If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
To: STARWISE
"They're busy sorting through the details, peeling back layers of the onion,"
In other words, like Fitz, they've caught Watergate Syndrome, and are seeing some vast conspiracy of "All The President's Men," when what was really happening was a few guys trying to figure out who the hell Joseph Wilson was, and what was he talking about? The real conspirators were Wilson, Corn, Plame, et al.
To: Steve_Seattle
And look at all the fodder for their books.
130
posted on
03/01/2007 4:35:56 PM PST
by
STARWISE
(They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
To: STARWISE
"They were to a one grinning from ear to ear, giggling, having the time of their lives"
I don't trust anything coming from "FireDogPuke" but if there is something to this and the jurors are really united and enjoying themselves then that would certainly bode ill for Libby. They could simply be agreeing to spend enough time together to "educate" themselves for their new media careers as propagandists for the left. I don't like to despair in advance of the verdict, but I cannot imagine any DC jury enjoying themselves so much if there was any chance they would not convict Libby..........
Of course, this could merely be wishful thinking from our friends at FireDogPuke........
131
posted on
03/01/2007 5:55:38 PM PST
by
Enchante
(Chamberlain Democrats embraced by terrorists and America-haters worldwide!!)
To: HardStarboard
Don't know about covert - I imagine there would be several levels of that. But Val, at the time of this whole embroglio, was pounding a desk at Langley and not in the field...and hadn't been for, what....2 years?
Besides Fedora excellent dissection of this subject, a very good summary and links on this thread :
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1790984/posts Specifically posts #38, #49, #53 relate to Plame's employment history.
132
posted on
03/01/2007 6:12:09 PM PST
by
CutePuppy
(If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-132 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson