I went there myself. The link leads to various postings from encyclopedia-type sources. What you cited was under the Wikipedia banner. And that was explained to you in the original thread - yet you've forgotten that as well. Want me to got back to the original document and link that as well? It's there.
And beyond that, this is the SECOND time we've been through this little exercise. You act like no one notices your little routine. You demand a link. Quibble over the details. Heck, I've even seen you deny something you posted earlier in a thread.
I used to think you were doing this deliberately. No one can be that dumb. But I must admit, you are starting to reach the threshhold of reasonable doubt.
Still having the vapors, I see. Try to toughen up. I'm content to have anyone who is interested in this minutia go to the link and see what I posted.
This is what I posted:
As governor in 1970, Reagan signed into law California's liberal abortion rights legislation, before Roe v Wade was decided. However, he later took a strong stand against abortion. He published the book Abortion and the Conscience of a Nation, which decried what Reagan saw as disrespect for life, promoted by the practice of abortion. However, two of the three Supreme Court justices he selected, Sandra Day O'Connor and Anthony Kennedy, voted to uphold Roe v. Wade.
http://www.answers.com/topic/ronald-reagan
Nowhere in my post does it mention Wikepedia. Yes, within the answer link, there are OTHER links, some of which lead to Wikepedia, but it's clear that I didn't click on those or post from those.
So carry on with your little charade.
When the law is not on your side, argue the facts; when the facts are not on your side, argue the law; and when neither the facts nor the law are on your side, pound the table.
In Peach's case, she's gone from arguing faulty facts, to feigning deliberate ignorance when confronted with her false claims, to hysterical name calling in an attempt to cover up both. Fortunately I think most people are intelligent enough to easily see these antics for what they really are.