Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Carter's crime of language on South African real victims of Apartheid
http://lightonthings.blogspot.com ^

Posted on 02/18/2007 9:21:02 PM PST by PRePublic

Carter's crime of language on South African real victims of Apartheid

In a more perfect world, you'd expect S. Africans to march against Arab-funded Carter calling 'war on terror' "apartheid"

But since PC is leading the charge, Islamic terrorists have managed to do just that, to instill fear & terror especially into lefty "intellectuals", all is fine then, no Israeli, or Zionist or even Christian will bomb/behead that confused propagandist: Jimmy Carter, so everything is just fine, so what if he admitted he used the "apartheid" slur on victim Israel only to provoke? the deal with the devil is done, the money is in the pocket, the "honor" that was never his turf inside Carter's home country, the loser found always friends that are anti west (from those that would have him & all the west under Islamic Inquisition,) the most radicals among them, as a matter of fact.

Thus, not only does Jimmy Carter commit a terrible crime in dehumanizing victims of anti-Israel, anti-Jewish Islamic-Fascist ("apartheid" is too delicate, actually) terrorists, in a country that it's Arabs not only are not second class but even have far more rights than Israeli Jews, (especially regarding access to holy sites in Jerusalem, court cases involving land disputes & benefits vis-a-vis obligation to serve in the army), but on the historic victims of the real apartheid, those of S. Africa, that is.


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: apartheid; arabism; arabist; arablobby; arabmoney; carter; dramalanguage; israel; jimmycarter; rop; southafrica; wot

1 posted on 02/18/2007 9:21:05 PM PST by PRePublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PRePublic

Carter notes that Israeli Arabs have the good fortune to live in Israel, which he states (I think) has more civil rights , free speech, and democracy than any other nation in the region.

He distinguishes "racial apartheid" from "territorial apartheid", the former not applying to Israel's treatment of the Palestinians in the West Bank.

He sees the similarities in the extensive monitoring, passbooks, checkpoints, etc. The endless dogging of the target group. He has a point there, especially on the cost to Israel.


2 posted on 02/18/2007 10:31:43 PM PST by secretagent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: secretagent
Even an Arabist like him couldn't deny the real-facts, but the damage was done, the label of "apartheid" is there (by him).
3 posted on 02/19/2007 5:35:01 PM PST by PRePublic (God Bless the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson