Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Libby Live: Tuesday, February 13, 2007
firedoglake.com ^ | 2/13/07 | firedoglake.com

Posted on 02/13/2007 8:14:45 AM PST by Bahbah

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: Rheo

Thank you Rheo!!


41 posted on 02/13/2007 1:05:32 PM PST by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE; Fedora

I second the kudos for Fedora!!

Yes...I think I will need an opinion from Clarice or even JOM...I am getting more confused, not less.

I am hoping that since Cheney and Libby won't be testifying, that means that Wells thinks he won't need them to get an acquittal.


42 posted on 02/13/2007 1:07:48 PM PST by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

If Andrea Mitchell is allowed to NOT testify, then I will KNOW that the Justice System in this country is BROKEN TOTALLY!!!


43 posted on 02/13/2007 1:09:26 PM PST by Suzy Quzy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

With all that on his plate, Libby was underpaid imo.


44 posted on 02/13/2007 1:14:41 PM PST by Carolinamom (Whatever you voted for, you did not vote for failure -- President Bush SOTU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Carolinamom; the Real fifi; Laverne; onyx; Howlin; SE Mom; Grampa Dave; samadams2000; ...

Y'all probably know this ... describes Scooter's bad memory issues, per John Hannah .. I've not read all the notes yet:

http://www.breitbart.com/news/2007/02/13/D8N8V9S01.html


45 posted on 02/13/2007 1:27:11 PM PST by STARWISE (They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

I hope the defense can bring up with the jury there, what Russert was promised by the attorneys. Prosecution said it was done verbally and defense is trying to get it in.


46 posted on 02/13/2007 1:40:58 PM PST by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Rheo

oops, judge says the defense should get something in writing regarding what Russert was promised.


47 posted on 02/13/2007 1:44:22 PM PST by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah
"The year of Iran"

Isn't this scribe clever? (Not)
48 posted on 02/14/2007 7:38:33 AM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

Russert on the hot seat
Clarice Feldman
Tim Russert has got some explaining to do. At the close of the Libby Trial on Tuesday, the defense indicated it wanted to recall Russert to the stand to impeach a statement of his. The life of a TV talking head tends to leave a lot of evidence of what one knows and doesn't know.

Russert had claimed that he didn't know that the special accommodations worked out by NBC lawyers and the prosecutor to allow him to give his deposition with his lawyers present and not before the grand jury was a special deal, and that he did not know that witnesses before a grand jury were not allowed to have counsel present.


I think this remark he made on the August [6], 1998 CNN Larry King Live show, will certainly be one of the impeaching statements the defense offers up:
RUSSERT: It's been suggested by no less than the former governor of New York the other night, that now that the president has decided that he's going to testify before the grand jury, why do it in the Oval Office and why insist that his lawyer be there.?


Go into the grand jury without a lawyer, like every other American citizen, go
ahead, ask me any question you want and I'll give you an honest answer.

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2007/02/russert_on_the_hot_seat.html

JOM has more on this.


49 posted on 02/14/2007 8:12:46 AM PST by the Real fifi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: the Real fifi

Thanks, fifi. Good stuff.


50 posted on 02/14/2007 8:26:14 AM PST by Bahbah (.Regev, Goldwasser & Shalit, we are praying for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson