Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Libby Live: Mystery Witness
firedoglake.com ^ | 2/12/07 | firedoglake.com

Posted on 02/12/2007 8:30:00 AM PST by Bahbah

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-119 next last
To: Bahbah

NEW WITNESS, GLEN KESSLER:

Walton: Tomorrow we'll have to break at 3:30. I've got a plea I need to make.

Glenn Kessler is up. I'll use GK for him.

David Corn says he went to high school with David Sanger and Brown U with Glenn Kessler. He voted against Sanger taking over the high school newspaper after he left.

New Defense lawyer. (I'll use D for him)

GK 9 years at WaPo, Diplomatic correspondant, travel around world with SOS, talk with anyone involved in foreign policy.

D Covered since you've been at post.

GK Almost five years.

D Have you won any awards.

GK laughs, Yes I have, twice part of groups that won Pulitzer. I've won awards.

D Direct attention to July 2003. What subjects.

GK What I cover now, US foreign policy.

D What were some of the issues.

GK a rather full range involving foreign policy. North Korean, Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Iraq.

D More specifically week of July 7, 2003. Did there come a time when you interviewed Libby.

GK Spoke to him on July 12, also July 18.

[they're constructing a timeline of all the journalists with whom libby spoke without leaking.]

GK helping a colleague who asked me to bounce some things off of Scooter.

D Did you contact them

GK No I contacted them, I also sent an email. My colleague had 5 specific questions he wanted to raise. These were the things we're hearing. Cathie gave partial answers, said Scooter would follow up.

D How did he follow-up

GK Telephone. He called me, I had heard from Cathie to expect call over weekend, I was at zoo with children, on a Saturday, on CT Avenue, the National Zoo. I had taken the questions of my colleague, they were in my pocket. I had my 3 children, who were 2, 6, and 10, I had received the call when I was in the elephant house.

D What makes it memorable for you.

GK I hadn't taken many calls in the elephant house, I had to sit on a stool in the middle of the elephant house, and I had to direct my 10 year old to make sure my other children weren't absconded.

D You were able to focus.

GK With occasional pausing to yell at my son to keep an eye on the others.

D Groundrules?

2:59


61 posted on 02/12/2007 12:16:56 PM PST by Bahbah (.Regev, Goldwasser & Shalit, we are praying for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

Thank you Bahbah for all the updates


62 posted on 02/12/2007 12:31:32 PM PST by Mo1 ( http://www.gohunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

THE SAGA CONTINUES:

I had had instructions from Martin and Mary Matalin that said that when Scooter says Off the record, he means Deep background. I have never discussed the topics of this subject with Fitzgerald. Libby is a confidential source. Since you're asking me, do I have permission to speak about this?

D Did you conversation have to do with Iraq and OVP?

D Did Libby say anything about Wilson's wife? Did you say anything to him.

GK No I did not.

D Are you certain about that?

GK I'm certain.

D Puts up the October 12 WaPo article.

Fitz Objection.

Kessler looks like he could be an ex-military guy, conservative hair cut, pretty big guy. He's looking around inquistively. Just saw someone and smiled big.

D Puts up the July 12 column with Libby's frantic underlines. This is an October 12 article written by Pincus and Allen. Reading from it. Did you ever discuss, were you a source for Pincus for this article? Did Libby discuss with you whether Wilson's trip was a boondoggle? Did you suggest to him in some way it was a boondoggle.

Fitz up

F Do you recall when your deposition outside GJ took place?

GK June 24?

F You appeared under oath in attorney's office, rather than before GJ?

Objection sustained

F You understand arrangement had to do with you as rep of media. You were asked qusetions limited by scope of Libby's waiver. You testified there were questions about planning for war in Iraq. In June 2004, you were not asked to testify about what the conversation was, only about whether Wilson and wife came up. Is it fair to say that arrangements did not affect truth in deposition.

F You're very clear that you did not discuss this with Pincus. Part of this is the unique memory of taking a cell phone call in the elephant house.

GK From memory as well as contemporaneous notes.

F Did you also check notes.

GK the actual notes were lost. Since I was doing a favor for a colleague, once I came back from Elephant house, I wrote up note and sent it off.

F Is it fair to say that you did nothing in terms of working with colleagues on story about Wilson's wife. You had a reaction when you read about Wilson's wife.

GK I read it in newspaper on 14th. I said Boy this is interesting.

F There's no way you had a conversation two days before.

GK I said, oh, this is news to me.

F And so that reinforces your memory that you had not conversation about this.

D Did you have an opportunity to review your notes.

GK It refreshed what the issues were, I was doing it as a favor for a colleague, they were his questions, not mine. I was able to remember what we talked about.

D This refreshed your recollection as to what you did not discuss.

Next witness–don't know who yet I'll stay here unless it is Harlow.


63 posted on 02/12/2007 12:31:35 PM PST by Bahbah (.Regev, Goldwasser & Shalit, we are praying for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah
"they're constructing a timeline of all the journalists with whom libby spoke without leaking"

I assume this is the transcriber's comment. The very fact that there are numerous journalists to whom Libby made no reference to Wilson's wife would seem to be prima facie evidence that there was no conspiracy to "out" Plame in retaliation for Wilson's op-ed. Also the fact that the original leaker was Armitage, in response to a question of Novak's. Moreover, his second source - Rove - merely confirmed what Novak already knew, and did not offer the information on his own initiative.

To sum up, all of the testimony thus far shows there was no conspiracy to "out" Plame. These were offhanded revelations, put forth in response to Novak's specific question as to why Wilson was selected for the Niger trip.
64 posted on 02/12/2007 12:32:29 PM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

You are most welcome, Mo.

I sometimes have trouble getting the other site to update. Probably my lack of knowledge.


65 posted on 02/12/2007 12:32:49 PM PST by Bahbah (.Regev, Goldwasser & Shalit, we are praying for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

NEXT WITNESS IS THAT WEASEL, EVAN THOMAS:

3:13

Fitz' line of questioning was to set up that Kessler testified under the exact same conditions as Russert, and he knew he hadn't talked about Plame since he was surprised when he read it in Novak's column.

Evan Thomas, Newsweek

Jeffress up, I'll use J and ET

ET Newsweek, 20 years, editor at large. 30 years as journalist

J Particular area of expertise?

ET No, mostly national security, politics, national news.

J Do you appear on television.

ET Sometimes.

J In July 2003, covering any particular stories?

ET We were writing about a variety of stories having to do with Iraq.

J did the issues concern pre-war intell.

ET [seems unsure] Yes, that summer,yes.

J Asks about 16 words and allegatoins.

J Do you know Scooter Libby, how many times did you talk to him?

ET A dozen times,

J all while he was ib OVP. And also Cathie Martin.

ET Originally about 9/11, then having to do with terrorist threats and invasion of Iraq.

J Do you ordinarily work on Saturdays? Do you recall taking a call from Libby that day?

ET Yes. No.

3:18

J You would return a call to Libby

ET Yes

J You have no recollectoin of doing so.

J Did you have any conversations about Wilson.

ET No.

Pass the witness.

No questions.

Next witness.

(It's like a speedway in here today)

3:20


66 posted on 02/12/2007 12:35:22 PM PST by Bahbah (.Regev, Goldwasser & Shalit, we are praying for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

3:20

New Defense Guy (we're joking this is like emptying the bench at the end of a game)

Carl Ford (I'll use CF and D), I have a one-person consulting company. It doens't sound very good just to say Ford, so I call it Ford and Associates. Had been working at Cantor Partners. I was EVP of Cassidy and Assc. It's a lobbying firm. I was Asst SOS 2001 until 2003.

D What is Intelligence and Research

CF It's part of intell community, but we're part of state. Take info from intell community and provide it to people at state.

D What were you duties.

CF Manage and minister office of 300 people. Primarily doing analysis for senior leadership for State. Powell, Armitage, Grossman,

D You were head of that section. To whom did you report?

CF Powell?

D Informal reporting

CF Most of my reporting to Powell, Armitage, occasionally to Grossman.

D Direct attention to June 2003, did there come a time when Grossman requested you provide info on issues relating to Iraq's attempt to acquire yellowcake. Precise date?

CF First week or so in June.

D Impersonal request? Anything to fix date.

CF It was an unusual request, I'd had a handful of requests, never about WMD and Iraq, just the fact that he asked about that meeting,

D Senior staff meeting,

CF Grossman chaired, SOS normaly chaired himself, on those occasions when he was traveling, Armitage took his place. Armitage not there, I was not privy to where he was at that point.

3:26


67 posted on 02/12/2007 12:37:29 PM PST by Bahbah (.Regev, Goldwasser & Shalit, we are praying for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: the Real fifi; Laverne; onyx; Howlin; SE Mom; Grampa Dave; samadams2000; popdonnelly; ...

Ping to more updates from the Libby Trial


68 posted on 02/12/2007 12:39:11 PM PST by Mo1 ( http://www.gohunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle
The "revenge" conspiracy smear was first started by Chrissy M., I remember laughing because I used to watch him for trial balloons and talking point tests for Dems, he always throws stuff out to see if it sticks.

Little did I know that the MSM would run with something so silly, but such is the state of our partisan media.
69 posted on 02/12/2007 12:41:09 PM PST by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah
"That weasel Evan Thomas."

Wow, these libs act as if the MSM are all conservatives and Bush bots. LOL
70 posted on 02/12/2007 12:42:54 PM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

THE STAMPEDE OF WITNESSES CONTINUES:

3:26

Putting up calendar.

D Taking a look at June 9, Monday, does that help refresh the date he asked you to provide information

CF It was Monday June 9

D Did Grossman tell you why he wanted it. Did he recall asking you because Libby requested the information? Is that the kind of info you would recall. After Grossman asked you to find out, what did you do?

CF Called people in INR responsible for following WMD issue. Neil Silver, I gave him the assignment I just received.

D Was a memo created to capture that info?

CF Yes.

[gives him a memo; btw, just a reminder, Ford is the guy who said Bolton was a knock down drag out guy.]

CF memo created in response to Grossman's request. Grossman didn't request you put it in memo.

D Top corner, date.

CF June 10, 2003.

D How long did it take you and your staff to prepare this

CF less than a day

D Do you know who Walter Kansteiner is

CF Asst SOS for Africa

D How long had you known him,

CF We were in many of the same meetings. There were at least one or two occasions in which we worked with Africa Bureau and I went down and talked about the project. We had more than just recognizing name relationship.

D Was Mr. Kansteiner, did you have any meetings or relations with Kansteiner in doing this memo

CF No, I did not.

D Was there a point when Grossman indicated to you that the info was somehow incomplete?

CF I don't recall anything of that nature. I don't recall him saying anything about the memo after it went to his office.

Pass the witness.

Zeidenberg up for Fitz

Z Fair to say this report would have been delivered to Grossman, either on June 10 or July 11.

CF It would have been hand-carried to his office. As soon as we could get it to him.

Witness dismissed

3:35


71 posted on 02/12/2007 12:45:26 PM PST by Bahbah (.Regev, Goldwasser & Shalit, we are praying for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Thanks, Mo! 70 degrees here and I have been OUTSIDE all day!


72 posted on 02/12/2007 12:46:36 PM PST by onyx (DEFEAT Hillary Clinton, Marxist, student of Saul Alinsky & ally and beneficiary of Soros.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

I was surprised the defense didn't have Ford describe the contents of the memo he prepared for Grossman. And it was amusing when he admitted that he added " . . . and Associates" to his business name even though he had no associates, it just sounded better.


73 posted on 02/12/2007 12:52:37 PM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: ScaniaBoy
"If the law supposes that,” said Mr. Bumble,… “the law is a ass—a idiot.....:

Although Mr. Bumble deserved no sympathy for his predicament, I agree with his characterization of the law when it is written and wielded by bozos like Fitz-fong. Too often it seems to be the defense bar that is able to abuse "technicalities" in US legal proceedings, but in this case it is the prosecution that is desperately spinning and deceiving, trying to keep the jury from having the full picture.
74 posted on 02/12/2007 12:54:54 PM PST by Enchante (Chamberlain Democrats embraced by terrorists and America-haters worldwide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Enchante
"Too often it seems to be the defense bar that is able to abuse "technicalities" in US legal proceedings, but in this case it is the prosecution that is desperately spinning and deceiving, trying to keep the jury from having the full picture."

Yes, this trial is an inversion of the normal situation. Usually, the prosecution has the facts on its side, and it's the defense that tries to keep out as many facts as possible. But this time it's Fitz trying to keep the facts out, which suggests that the facts are detrimental to his case.
75 posted on 02/12/2007 12:59:21 PM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: onyx
70 degrees here and I have been OUTSIDE all day!

You know I hate you *L*

just kidding ;-)

76 posted on 02/12/2007 12:59:22 PM PST by Mo1 ( http://www.gohunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Enchante
Although Mr. Bumble deserved no sympathy for his predicament..., OK, I'll have to agree on that.

:-)

But I'm not sure you would be allowed even to think this today:

"'You were present on the occasion…and, indeed, you are the more guilty of the two, in the eye of the law; for the law supposes that your wife acts under your direction.

Cheers,

SB

77 posted on 02/12/2007 1:00:30 PM PST by ScaniaBoy (Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Yeah, I know....lol. Rain and dreary weather coming in from TX and LA tonight, but a promised low of only 54 degrees. I am feeling a lot happier today. I truly need warm weather and sunshine.


78 posted on 02/12/2007 1:02:01 PM PST by onyx (DEFEAT Hillary Clinton, Marxist, student of Saul Alinsky & ally and beneficiary of Soros.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: ScaniaBoy; All

An interesting comment from one of the firedoglake readers:

" pattern emerges as emptywheel notes. They’re constructing the timeline of a gaggle of reporters (I won’t call them journalists) who were on the receiving end of leaks from a plethora of sources, e.g. Ari, Armi, Rove, but not Libby. The reporters who spoke to Libby didn’t learn the Plame identity from him. Ergo, since Libby also spoke with many reporters it’s plausible that he did, in fact, hear for the first time that Wilson’s wife worked for the CIA from a reporter during the course of his conversations with them.

That’s my take on Team Libby’s strategery. They certaily seem to be hammering on the “everybody knew” theme."


79 posted on 02/12/2007 1:03:06 PM PST by Bahbah (.Regev, Goldwasser & Shalit, we are praying for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Thank you for the ping. I"m trying to keep up today, but have a dozen things going on.
80 posted on 02/12/2007 1:03:19 PM PST by Dolphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-119 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson