Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FR Exclusive! Scorching memorandum obtained from the Lt. Nathan Phan hearing
Free Republic Exclusive | February 1, 2007 | RedRover

Posted on 02/01/2007 7:10:42 PM PST by RedRover

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 241-244 next last
To: RedRover

DOCTOR! DOCTOR! This man's insane!


141 posted on 02/03/2007 11:06:41 AM PST by freema (Marine FRiend, 1stCuz2xRemoved, Mom, Aunt, Sister, Friend, Wife, Daughter, Niece)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: freema
Shhh! I think I've fooled them into believing that I'm Abraham Lincoln!

Gosh, these gowns are a bit drafty.

142 posted on 02/03/2007 11:15:18 AM PST by RedRover (Grant, march on Vicksburg at once!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

LOL!

Sorry I guess I am just slow!


143 posted on 02/03/2007 11:20:51 AM PST by pinkpanther111 (They were doing their jobs!!! Defend our Marines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: pinkpanther111

Yeah right, slow like a bloggin' tornado. ;)


144 posted on 02/03/2007 12:09:02 PM PST by RedRover (Defend our Marines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

Just catching up. But WOW on the press release. Is the destroyed flash drive possibly the reason the attorneys want some classified information included in this hearing? Any ideas why it would be destoyed initially?

The defense attorneys are making some serious allegations about the NCIS agents here:

"For example, at least three witnesses to relevant events told NCIS agents they saw no misconduct of any kind by Lt. Phan. Instead of accurately reporting these facts, NCIS agents coerced and threatened these witnesses and ordered them to sign statements to the contrary."

And the defense is going after the prosecutors here:

"These witnesses later informed prosecutors of these events and further told them what they had really observed and experienced. Of course, not only did these prosecutors not disclose these important facts to the defense (as they are strictly required to do), they then loudly browbeat these witnesses in an effort to convince them to stick with the NCIS-fabricated version of events."

Wow! Anybody know if this has been provided to the North County Times since they have been following this case? Of course these are just allegations by the defense at this time, but the NCT might want to add this info to their review of this case.

Sounds like Nathan Phan has some fighters for his defense team. They're accusing everybody of something!


145 posted on 02/03/2007 12:09:24 PM PST by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

Did you tell'em you had Pigott's Syndrome, you were very hot, and needed a Phan?


146 posted on 02/03/2007 12:42:37 PM PST by freema (Marine FRiend, 1stCuz2xRemoved, Mom, Aunt, Sister, Friend, Wife, Daughter, Niece)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

Just noticed this after rereading the press release:

"Lt Phan, whose family immigrated from Vietnam"

So nice to see Lt. Phan is honoring America, who gave his family the opportunity of freedom, with his service.

An old co-worker came from Vietnam and one day recounted his experiences in getting to America. Awesome story and such a reminder of how fortunate I was to be born in this country.


147 posted on 02/03/2007 12:56:34 PM PST by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: freema

I love it.


148 posted on 02/03/2007 3:01:11 PM PST by lilycicero (SSgt Frank Wuterich did his job well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: lilycicero

; )

I think they've done gone and locked him up.

Probably spouting all manner of Lincoln quotes

"Those who deny freedom to others, deserve it not for themselves; and, under a just God, can not long retain it." The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln edited by Roy P. Basler, Volume III, "Letter To Henry L. Pierce and Others" (April 6, 1859), p. 376.

"Both parties deprecated war; but one of them would make war rather than let the nation survive; and the other would accept war rather than let it perish. And the war came." Lincoln's Second Inaugural Address, March 4, 1865.

"I have been driven many times upon my knees by the overwhelming conviction that I had nowhere else to go. My own wisdom and that of all about me seemed insufficient for that day." Lincoln Observed: The Civil War Dispatches of Noah Brooks edited by Michael Burlingame (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1998), p. 210.

{{{{{{{{{{{{Red}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}


149 posted on 02/03/2007 3:14:53 PM PST by freema (Marine FRiend, 1stCuz2xRemoved, Mom, Aunt, Sister, Friend, Wife, Daughter, Niece)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: freema
Aw, shucks, ma!

'''|'''

(Note: The above is meant to symbolize a wagging tail.)


150 posted on 02/03/2007 7:04:50 PM PST by RedRover (Defend our Marines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: sailor4321; lilycicero; Girlene; 4woodenboats; pinkpanther111; smoothsailing; jazusamo; freema; ...
A few times on our threads, I've been (lightly) flamed over the issue of defense JAGs. The only lawyers making noise in the press are civilian so they are the ones I've saluted most often.

sailor4321 is a knowledgable guy so I Freepmailed him to get a better handle on the workings of a defense team. Also to be sure I wasn't overstating the case about the need for civilian lawyers for the accused.

sailor wrote back a thoughtful response that I want to share:

Civilian counsel — unlike military counsel – is free to say what the truth is in the media and is not restricted in getting info to the press and public.

Conversely, as has been sadly demonstrated time and gain, when military defense counsel say ANYTHING publicly (even if it is 100 per cent true) they get hammered by headquarters Marine Corps and a ton of pressure, accusations etc. gets rolled downhill.

When there is a civilian counsel, he can say/do public/media-wise what military counsel are simply prevented from doing. Also, at least it appears in this case (unlike some cases with a civilian-military defense team), civilian counsel is actually earning his money and both the civilian and military counsel are really operating as a “team” in the fullest sense.

Reality however dictates that what military counsel do remain sort of “under the radar” - if only the civilian counsel is in the spotlight, that means the Marine Corps can do nothing by way of reprisal or pressure.

In sum, absolutely the Hamdania/Haditha defendants need civilian counsel (particularly those of Dave Sheldon’s backbone, work ethic and integrity – unlike some civilian counsel who just see these cases as a business opportunity or PR bonus! Without them, the accused and the numerous injustices they face would be effectively muzzled.

151 posted on 02/03/2007 8:56:06 PM PST by RedRover (Defend our Marines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: RedRover; sailor4321

I like the fact that a sailor gave us some new perspective.

Thank you sailor and shippy (Red).


152 posted on 02/03/2007 9:24:40 PM PST by lilycicero (SSgt Frank Wuterich did his job well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

Aw, Red, I love you.


153 posted on 02/04/2007 7:32:04 AM PST by freema (Marine FRiend, 1stCuz2xRemoved, Mom, Aunt, Sister, Friend, Wife, Daughter, Niece)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

If this is true, or even partly true, sounds like the odds are stacked in favor of prosection in the UCMJ system. I hope not.


154 posted on 02/04/2007 8:51:59 AM PST by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: All; pinkpanther111; El Gato; jude24; sailor4321; WTFNG?; 4woodenboats; freema; Paco; flightline; ..

I received a Freepmail this morning in reference to my POST 62 from a new newcomer with the screen name WTFNG?.

Post 62 is where I said: Reliable sources tell me that those two JAGs: Lieutenant Colonel Matthew W. Cord, USMC and Major Jeffrey V. Muñoz, USMC, were instrumental in uncovering the fabrications by NCIS agents that were introduced as evidence in this hearing.

WTFNG? wrote:

You are correct that the 2 military defense counsel were instrumental in obtaining the affidavits.

I've read some of your other posts concerning whether Lt Phan's military counsel are pulling their own weight vis a vis David Sheldon.

I have good reason to believe very strongly that LtCol Cord and Maj Munoz are vigorously and zealously representing Lt Phan behind the scenes. It would be a grave error in logic to believe that they are not doing anything simply because they choose not to put their names in the paper. Trial work is not like it is shown on TV -- a crime is committed, investigated, and someone is convicted all within 20 minutes. Trial work is very tedious and grueling. There is much preparation that takes place prior to ever walking one foot into a courtroom. I can only wonder who is doing all of that preparation?

You're running a good service. Keep up the good work. But please, give military defense counsel a fair shake. Unless you have objective evidence to demonstrate that they are lazy slugs, it is unfair to suggest that they are not fulfilling their professional duties.

WTFNG? is right. I was wrong. So I went back through my posts and asked the Moderator to zot the ones that gave all the credit to David Sheldon and none to the JAG defense counsel. There were about four in all and they're gone now.

I asked WTFNG? what he or she thought of sailor’s comment at POST 151. WTFNG? replied:

Sailor4321 is correct and seems quite knowledgeable on the topic.

In these high profile cases, I believe civilian defense counsel are very necessary for the reasons stated by Sailor4321. However one should not interpret that to mean that military defense counsel are not effective.

Sailor4321 described it accurately when he said they operate "under the radar."

I just want the public to know that military defense counsel, based on my information, very much zealously defend their clients and to some extent enjoy fighting "the man."

Consider this: as a military defense counsel, it seems that is the only job in the military where one is authorized to buck the system, and indeed likely has a duty to buck the system to benefit the client.

Finally, I do strongly encourage supporting the defense funds. Lt Phan stands wrongly accused as do the Haditha Marines. Supporting the defense fund is one way, a big way, to support them and their families.

These servicemembers volunteer to do our dirty work in Iraq and Afghanistan to the best of their abilities and when they do, they are sent to court martial. Further, then they're treated like 2d class citizens by the less-than-professional NCIS who doesn't record interviews. So, it will always be NCIS's word against the suspect's word. Who do you think the military is going to believe? Take care.

I hope WTFNG? will come back and post. I'm very gratified that these threads are attracting new people to the discussion.

And Happy Superbowl Sunday to all!

155 posted on 02/04/2007 3:20:03 PM PST by RedRover (Defend our Marines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

yes indeed, enjoy the game, welcome WTFNG?


156 posted on 02/04/2007 3:45:48 PM PST by flightline (they fight for us,We fight for them........!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

I post these things on Togetherweserved.com


157 posted on 02/04/2007 4:22:45 PM PST by RaceBannon (Innocent until proven guilty: The Pendleton 8...down to 2...GWB, we hardly knew ye...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: flightline

What game?

; )

Welcome WTFNG?


158 posted on 02/04/2007 4:26:09 PM PST by freema (Marine FRiend, 1stCuz2xRemoved, Mom, Aunt, Sister, Friend, Wife, Daughter, Niece)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: freema
Here, ma. This is for you!


159 posted on 02/04/2007 5:45:28 PM PST by RedRover (Defend our Marines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: RedRover; flightline
Oh, Red, I LOVE IT! I'll need to go shoooooeshoooooopping! These would look pri- T -snappy dangling off my toes!
I went shoooooooooeshooooooooooopping today to replace a pair of run-abouts that are getting ragged. Man, there are some UGLY shoes out there!
160 posted on 02/04/2007 6:59:14 PM PST by freema (Marine FRiend, 1stCuz2xRemoved, Mom, Aunt, Sister, Friend, Wife, Daughter, Niece)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 241-244 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson