Skip to comments.
DUmmie FUnnies 01-19-07 (Global Warming Becomes Democrat "Science" Orthodoxy)
DUmmie FUnnies ^
| January 19, 2007
| DUmmies and PJ-Comix
Posted on 01/19/2007 6:23:25 AM PST by PJ-Comix
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-143 next last
To: dinasour
The aim of Global Warming hysterians is to keep the poor in poverty and punish the wealthy nations for taking good care of the environment. What a plan!
41
posted on
01/19/2007 7:46:52 AM PST
by
Mr. Silverback
("Safe sex? Not until they develop a condom for the heart."--Freeper All the Best)
To: PJ-Comix
top 176 self ping for later laughs....I will sure need it.
42
posted on
01/19/2007 7:48:24 AM PST
by
CSM
(We're not losing our country, some are just throwing it away. - Sherri-D)
To: PJ-Comix
I see a flaw in her logic. If the globe warms up we burn less fossil fuels to stay warm, producing less CO2, then the globe cools off. Oh,Oh! we are doomed!
43
posted on
01/19/2007 7:53:39 AM PST
by
westmichman
(The will of God always trumps the will of the people.)
To: PJ-Comix
44
posted on
01/19/2007 7:56:43 AM PST
by
bcsco
To: george76
Exactly why is the worlds biggest polluter allowed to sign Kyoto but is completely free of all aspects of the Kyoto protocol and its wealth transfer scheme, is it because they are Communists? Here's how Kyoto works:
1. Rich countries that take good care of the environment are penalized for doing so...well, actually, they're penalized for being rich, but the result is the same.
2. Poor countries are penalized for being poor.
3. Wealthy countries run by commies get to keep polluting the planet with total gusto.
4. India gets to keep pouring carbon into the air and heavy metals in their rivers, even though they're not commies. You see, they aren't poor enough to oppress and haven't been wealthy long enough to take good care of their environment and be punished for that.
And there are people who are surprised the Senate killed this.
45
posted on
01/19/2007 7:57:31 AM PST
by
Mr. Silverback
("Safe sex? Not until they develop a condom for the heart."--Freeper All the Best)
To: bcsco
"Many of the truths we cling to depend greatly on our point of view."--Obi-Wan Kenobi
46
posted on
01/19/2007 8:01:15 AM PST
by
Mr. Silverback
("Safe sex? Not until they develop a condom for the heart."--Freeper All the Best)
To: bcsco
Skinner nailed her to the wall.
47
posted on
01/19/2007 8:06:41 AM PST
by
Mr. Silverback
("Safe sex? Not until they develop a condom for the heart."--Freeper All the Best)
To: bcsco
48
posted on
01/19/2007 8:10:23 AM PST
by
Mr. Silverback
("Safe sex? Not until they develop a condom for the heart."--Freeper All the Best)
To: Paradox
And I say that as someone who BELIEVES in Global Warming, and thinks that it is probably that humans are responsible for at least some of it. This isn't a shot, though it might read like one.
In An Inconvenient Truth, Gore shows a chart showing and association between temps at the high end of the range and carbon percentages in the atmosphere at the high end of the range. The problem is, some of these cycles occurred before humans developed civilizations. So if we're causing global warming with our carbon emissions, what caused it before humans had carbon emissions? It's not as if GM is sending SUVs back in time.
49
posted on
01/19/2007 8:19:55 AM PST
by
Mr. Silverback
("Safe sex? Not until they develop a condom for the heart."--Freeper All the Best)
To: PJ-Comix
"To me, it's clearly a good thing that the scientific community is starting to step up and call out the few remaining flat-earthers."
Now, this is truly a DUmmie! He doesn't even see that he is in the role of a flat-earther that would like to punish anyone who questions the "estblished science." If there is no questioning of science allowed, the flat-earthers would be the winners. DUmmie ignorance astounds me!
50
posted on
01/19/2007 8:22:08 AM PST
by
CSM
(We're not losing our country, some are just throwing it away. - Sherri-D)
To: Mr. Silverback
Do you doubt her gender?No, I just don't consider her a 'chick'.
BTW, there are at least 2 more threads that have developed on FR regarding this. She and the Weather Channel are apparently taking some heat from her blog comments.
51
posted on
01/19/2007 8:24:20 AM PST
by
bcsco
To: Mr. Silverback
What a plan! Don't get me started. Wait, I am already started.
And another thing.
What other "scientific" community is threatening to have their detractors punished, even thrown in jail.
Even the Evolution vs. Creation folks, contentious as they are, aren't going that far.
I think this speaks to the weakness of the Global Warming hysterians, not their strength.
52
posted on
01/19/2007 8:28:15 AM PST
by
dinasour
(Pajamahadeen, SnowFlake, and Eeevil Doer.)
To: Mr. Silverback; Condor51
Condor51 has some really good comments on one of the other threads on this subject:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1770190/posts?page=37#37She's not ready for the big leagues; she only thinks she is. And the Weather Channel is taking the heat by putting her in such a prominent position. But then, she reflects their warped views.
53
posted on
01/19/2007 8:32:50 AM PST
by
bcsco
To: Mr. Silverback
It's not as if GM is sending SUVs back in time.
---
Ha!! Little do you know! You obviously haven't read GM's annual report. Look on page 47.
Ok, I made that up. But I bet I could get Algore to believe it.
54
posted on
01/19/2007 8:49:18 AM PST
by
Cheburashka
( World's only Spatula City certified spatula repair and maintenance specialist!!!)
To: bcsco
Thanks. This Heidi is a dolt and way over her head.
She should watch the Science Channel and learn something.
55
posted on
01/19/2007 9:02:31 AM PST
by
Condor51
(The demoncRATs don't want another 'Vietnam' - they want another Dien Bien Phu.)
To: bcsco
ATTENTION!!! Heidi Cullen is now attempting a backpedal. Read about it on her
BLOG.
56
posted on
01/19/2007 9:03:42 AM PST
by
PJ-Comix
(Join the DUmmie FUnnies PING List for the FUNNIEST Blog on the Web)
To: PJ-Comix
57
posted on
01/19/2007 9:07:50 AM PST
by
txroadkill
(Did you see Jack 'Vamp' that dude's throat to escape??? That was cool!!!!)
To: Condor51
This Heidi is a dolt and way over her head.I think the Weather Channel is beginning to take some heat for this fact. But then, they hired her to do exactly what she's doing; keep global warming an issue and keep it in the forefront of public perception. What goes around comes around.
58
posted on
01/19/2007 9:11:10 AM PST
by
bcsco
To: txroadkill; All
FLASH!!! Rush Limbaugh NOW talking about Heidi Cullen!!!
59
posted on
01/19/2007 9:11:11 AM PST
by
PJ-Comix
(Join the DUmmie FUnnies PING List for the FUNNIEST Blog on the Web)
To: PJ-Comix
I've read all your comments saying I want to silence meteorologists who are skeptical of the science of global warming. That is not true. The point of my post was never to stifle discussion. It was to raise it to a level that doesn't confuse science and politics.PJ, I don't think she's backpeddling. She's not retracting her statement. She's taking the John Kerry approach and saying that we're all wrong for misunderstanding her.
60
posted on
01/19/2007 9:14:09 AM PST
by
bcsco
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-143 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson