[lifelong_republican]

You don't seem to realize that the reportage of the facts about the unreliability and lack of security in the electronic votefraud systems isn't limited to a single source, and that a reference to a source rather than to the issue is merely a form of fallacy.

Here's another (out of many) confirming sources:

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/11/1101_041101_election_voting.html

[Pan_Yans Wife]

You are accusing me of fallacy?

Look in the mirror! This is YOUR post, YOUR article, and you are defending it badly by sputtering on about fallacy. Calm down so you can collect your thoughts.

You only mentioned the Amherst Times... no mention of the NYTimes. And it goes without saying that about eighty percent of what the NYTimes writes is suspect. (I've done a bit of posting and reading and find their attempt at accuracy way off.)

I invite you to spend a month reading the NYTimes and to come up with your own conclusions. But maybe that's too much to ask.

In the end... I'll never reading anything by the Amherst Times. Do you know why? Who gives a darn what is being said in Amherst of all places! The fact that you vigilantly want to defend it makes one wonder...