I've wondered for a long time what your problem was, but now I know: you have no sense of humor. The part about homosexuality was intended to lighten up the article; some see it, some don't.
The rest of the article is quite factual, and it has been standard practice for oncologists to warn their brest and prostate cancer patients to stay away from soy, due to the phyto-estrogen.
Articles like this doom WND. No, water causes homosexuality"
I've wondered for a long time what your problem was, but now I know: you have no sense of humor. The part about homosexuality was intended to lighten up the article; some see it, some don't.
The rest of the article is quite factual, and it has been standard practice for oncologists to warn their brest and prostate cancer patients to stay away from soy, due to the phyto-estrogen.
_______
Does it really matter? We've gone way off topic already here, this is now officially a fun thread, no factual or scientific analysis allowed anymore!
Having seen a lot of WingNutDaily stuff, they're deadly serious about their idiocy, and I don't think this was intended as a humor piece at all.
Oviously, you didn't even bother to read the post you replied to, or you'd see I have a sense of humor. As far as this article, I don't see intentional humor, nor was it appropriate. Unfortunately, it's scientifically very naive. Plant estrogens are not the same as human estrogens. How come we don't see these scare articles about plant testosterones? In fact, they market them as ways to reduce cholesterol?