$20bn gas project seized by Russia

Russia is employing its normal brutal methods in breaking contracts signed in the early '90s when the opening up of Russia gave oil internationals like Shell and BP access to great deals in new oil and gas plays.

One of the reasons BP bought Amoco Corp where I used to work was to get the large Russian gas fields and other good plays that Amoco had sagely negotiated.

Russia in its implacable clumsy ham-handed fashion is buying and bribing and strong-arming its way into putting the EU into an energy vise.

No media outlet has noted that Russian pressure on Georgia aims someday to influence or control the Baku/Ceyhan pipeline transiting Georgia and ensuring its energy independence from Russia, along with income from pipeline fees.

But the larger goal would be to pinch off the hose from the Azerbaijan oil spigot and put that country under the Russian sphere of influence.

The Russians are cozying up to Iran for the same reason, and along with China are going to support Iran's nuclear weapon development in the UN for "raisons d'etat" that have more to do with energy than any other goal. Russia has even got Iranian support for its brutal Chechen campaign, although the Muslims in Chechnya are ethnically and linguistically Iranian. Armenia is also an ally with both Iran and Moscow in the Russian near-abroad phalanx moving to take over control of the Caucasus.

Now if the Iranians can somehow control or even preponderantly influence Iraqi energy after the US defeatists manage to cut and depart from that sad country, the Saudis and Gulfies will cower. Believe me, they are afraid of Iran all by itself, and under the combined weight of natural gas powerhouses like Russia, Iran, and tiny Qatar, will bend in the new wind blowing from the north and east. Among the three of them, they have more than 50% of the world's proven gas reserves.

Jonathan Stern of London's OxfordEnergy may disagree, but as Ukraine found out early this year, the Russians play hardball without gloves, in the middle of winter!

Vladimir Putin's may be uttering platitudes that the March 2006 EU Green Energy Policy gurus to the extent that these ostriches don't foresee a problem, but the IEA World Energy Outlook note there is more than one cloud out there on the horizon.

And an OPEC for Natural Gas, with Venezuela hosting this year's Forum [the Venz don't even have a gas export program yet], is in an inchoate nascent stage. This ONGEC might be to the 21st century 20 years down the road, what the Oil Exporter's OPEC was in the twentieth.

Dick Cheney for one is concerned, and a lot of EU countries are starting to stir from their slumber, although German Judas-Goat Gerhard Schroeder at Gazprom's pipeline keeps lulling them back to sleep.

Like a chess player, Putin in his mid-fifties may be planning strategically with a lot of moves already in his head. We'll know for sure what's up if he decides to overthrow the Constitution and run for a third term next year. [Oops, I meant revise the Constitution!]

But to end on a high note, there is one joker in the pack. And that is the continuing development of oil and gas extraction technology far beyond what is anticipated. That has been the case since I first got acquainted with the oil industry and may continue, in the which-case, the entire scenario will be rosier.

Unless Al Gore is elected Prez in '08 and Global Warming hysteria causes the collective collapse of energy exploration and development.

When Yeltsin was in power he negotiated some PSA's Sakhalin 1-3 and Kharyaga which were very favorable terms for the operators and not the Russian government.

Exxon has Sakhalin 1 and lost 3, Shell 2, and Total Khargaya.

Those projects are really big and profitable and the Russians want a bigger share or more attrative terms than what Yeltsin gave them away for in the 80's.

While I dont condone what they have done, it is no worse than Chavez and Morales who kicked alot of companies right out of the country and nationalized their assets.

It is a sign of the times in the oil industry these days.

After living in Norway for 17 years, I can understand it as the Norwegian state felt that they should have control of their natural resources.

but as Ukraine found out early this year, the Russians play hardball without gloves, in the middle of winter! ==

If you refuse to pay your gas company the market price then your company will play "hardball" with you too..

One of the reasons BP bought Amoco Corp where I used to work was to get the large Russian gas fields and other good plays that Amoco had sagely negotiated.==

If AMOCO managed in mid90th to buy some russian politicains and negotiate stealing of those gas fields it doesn't mean that Russia should agree with it today. After all Khodorkovskii went to prison for lesser deeds. Of cause Russia cann't put in prison the headship of Amoco but at least she can manage the renegotiation of extremely unbenefitial former deals with them. Especially if they violated clauses even those stealing deals they got.

Actually economic rape of Russia in 90th undermined cooperation for decades to come. It was worse then in Weimar Germany and we know how Weimar Germany ended.

Economist Laszlo Andor has called this "Europe's great depression", the biggest economic slump in the continent since the 30s. in 90th IMF policies had wrecked nearly half of Russia's economic capacity in the space of just a few years -- a level of destruction not even Hitler's Nazi armies had achieved.

Now chickens come roost home. Instead of chasing quick buck and trying to make Russia New Latin America multinationals would be better off building mutually beneficial economic relations.

As Anne Williamson's testified before the Committee on Banking and Financial Services of the U.S. House of Representatives in 1999. "It shows how the historic opportunity given the U.S. to help transform Russia into a free, peaceful, pro-Western country was squandered in the form of a bruising economic rape carried out by corrupt Russian politicians and businessmen, assisted by Bush and (especially) Clinton administrations engaged in political payoffs to Wall Street bankers and others, and by ineptitude and greed on the part of the U.S. Treasury and the Harvard Institute for International Development, assisted by fellow travelers and manipulators at Nordex, the IMF, the World Bank, and the Federal Reserve."

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.