[kenavi]

We need a candidate who does not discombobulate in the face of hostile journalists or Dem party operatives (as George Allen did).

We need a President who has already held the reins of power, rather than selecting one on the basis of his mouthing all the positions we agree with.

I realize that opposition to abortion is for some the overriding cause upon which to support a candidate, and they will not tolerate anything less than their own absolute stance. The problem is that by not supporting anyone less fervent than themselves, they will help elect a President who is absolutely contrary to their position, and who will also endanger the security of us all.

[Pukin Dog]

You can save your breath, because the wacko 100%ers are not listening. The facts dont mean anything in the face of what they want. They dont have a viable candidate, they never have had a viable candidate. These are the Buchananites trying to sneak back into the party after being booted for their nonsense. They will remain nothing but a nuisance right up to the election where they will endorse some nut like Tancredo as their representative.