Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

India wants USS Trenton rechristened Jalashva
The Indian Express ^ | 02/11/06 | Shiv Aroor

Posted on 11/04/2006 4:27:17 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki

Navy wants USS Trenton rechristened Jalashva

Shiv Aroor

Posted online: Thursday, November 02, 2006 at 0000 hrs

NEW DELHI, NOVEMBER 1: With five months to go for the American warship USS Trenton to join the Indian fleet, the Navy has proposed that the amphibious vessel be rechristened INS Jalashva — Sanskrit for Sea Horse — when it is commissioned in March next year. Still to be approved by President APJ Abdul Kalam, the name was prioritised as the Navy’s top choice among a few others by just retired Navy Chief Admiral Arun Prakash.

The other two large amphibious ships in the Navy are INS Magar (crocodile) and INS Gharial (another reptile from the crocodile family). From a list of names, Jalashva was ticked by the former Navy Chief before the file was sent to Rashtrapati Bhavan, sources said. The USS Trenton, with the motto “No Greater Gator” was commissioned in 1971 and named after the capital of New Jersey state.

The 17,000-ton warship, likely to be based at Visakhapatnam under the Eastern Naval Command, will be the Navy’s second largest vessel after aircraft carrier INS Viraat, which itself will move to second place in size when the Russian aircraft carrier rechristened INS Vikramaditya is commissioned in late 2008.

The Navy got its first taste of American amphibious warfare equipment when it exercised with the US Expeditionary Strike Group (ESG), a task force that included the USS Boxer, Washington’s amphibious flagship, off the Goa coast this week.

About the Trenton, the new Navy Chief Admiral Sureesh Mehta yesterday said, “It brings about a different dimension to our fighting capabilities. We will have a capability to influence the land battle with long-range weapons and the ability to transport large numbers of people from one place to another.”

The Navy is also in negotiations to purchase six H-3 Sea King maritime utility transport helicopters for operations off the Trenton’s deck.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: india; indiannavy; navy; usstrenton
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: 1rudeboy
Heheheh, good point. 'We're going to get the ship one way or another'. ;>)

...when you consider the alternative of breaking it down (in India, most likely--LOL)...

21 posted on 11/04/2006 6:24:24 AM PST by Ready4Freddy ("Everyone knows there's a difference between Muslims and terrorists. No one knows what it is, tho...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: disraeligears

Not at all. Some older Great Lakes ore carriers have had as many as three names.


22 posted on 11/04/2006 6:30:04 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: john drake

A ship like this is a sitting duck in most situations without escorts whether it's 35 years old or 3 months old!!


23 posted on 11/04/2006 6:36:25 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: disraeligears
Yes, superstition says that it's bad luck to rename a ship after its christening. Usually that's worked around by re-christening the ship with its new name. But, it's bad luck to rename a ship after someone who has died aboard her. It's also supposed to bad luck for a ship's name to end in the letter a (think Lusitania, Andrea Doria and Arizona.

FWIW, the U.S. Navy doesn't follow any of these superstitions. For example, the ship christened USS Scorpion was renamed USS George Washington during construction. Tragically, it was Scorpion that was lost with all hands on May 22, 1968. I actually served on a ship that ended in the letter a, USS Atlanta, the fourth ship to bear that name. She was definately an unlucky ship, but not in a tragic sense. :)

24 posted on 11/04/2006 6:53:51 AM PST by Doohickey (I am not unappeasable. YOU are just too easily appeased.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: john drake

"Am I bad or what?" - No. You are just realistic, and get a bonus point for it.


25 posted on 11/04/2006 7:37:15 AM PST by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson