To: Jay777
It seems like they were referring to the early 1990's was when he was close to having nukes.
To: Alfonso1000
It seems like they were referring to the early 1990's was when he was close to having nukes. Oh I don't know.. oh by the way. welcome to FR.
18 posted on
11/02/2006 8:02:10 PM PST by
mware
To: Alfonso1000
Nice try Alfonso.
And welcome to FR.
To: Alfonso1000; Jay777
That's it exactly folks, spin it like it's waaaaayyyyy
past tense, while still catching the scoop!...JJ61
22 posted on
11/02/2006 8:03:27 PM PST by
JerseyJohn61
(Better Late Than Never.......sometimes over lapping is worth the effort....)
To: Alfonso1000
Enjoy your short stay at FR......
28 posted on
11/02/2006 8:05:10 PM PST by
ohioWfan
(PROUD Mom of an Iraqi Freedom VALEDICTORIAN VET!! Take THAT mr stinky frenchman!)
To: Alfonso1000
43 posted on
11/02/2006 8:36:28 PM PST by
1035rep
To: Alfonso1000
--It seems like they were referring to the early 1990's was when he was close to having nukes.--
The liberals at the time were chanting 'no blood for oil!' in the streets and OPPOSING Gulf War 1. Among them was John F. Kerry.
Without Gulf War 1, Saddam indeed WOULD have developed a nuke, with which to blackmail the Saudis, Iranians, and choke off the world's oil supply.
70 posted on
11/03/2006 2:04:19 AM PST by
rfp1234
(I've had it up to my keyster with these leaks!!! - - - Ronald Reagan)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson