Replies

I'm hoping everyone will please go here: http://www.angelfire.com/blog/stemcells/ and pass this url around to everyone they know the next few days. My wife just did a research paper on Stem Cell Research that she'd worked on the past month, and it really destroys the argument that embryonic and fetal stem cells have any promise for curing anything. The great sources that Rush cited the past couple weeks have been a great part to this paper. It's all factual with sources cited with their original journal listings, or the scientists who wrote the material.

We're hoping that by making this page of the research paper, it might get to some who have bought the media line and liberal Democrat lies about supposed embryonic and fetal "research", and maybe serve to educate and bring them into the real world with the facts about it all, not the fantasy over-medicated land that Michael J. Fox lives in, where he uses and abuses his disability and does political ads about legislation he hasn't even bothered to read, while over-medicating to get maximum manipulative effect with the audience. Please pass this around. It's in the first stage but I wanted to get it up as soon as possible. It will be improved with text link urls and archived pages of the journal articles in the coming days. I'm especially hoping that this gets distributed widely in Missouri, Maryland and Tennessee where this is so important in the Senate races there. Thank you.

http://www.angelfire.com/blog/stemcells/

IMHO, one of the best purely-secular arguments for pushing adult stem cell research instead of embryonic is that developments with adult-stem-cells will likely allow people to receive transplants of cells cultured from their own body (which are guaranteed to be a perfect match). This is a huge advantage, and one which embryonic cells cannot match.

I've seen nothing to suggest that embryonic cells have any advantage sufficient to justify giving up that key advantage of adult cells.