To: FreedomCalls
Since the Supreme Court of Canada simply ordered a retrial (instead of the typical 9th Circus/lieberal Lawgivers-In-Black complete vacation and no retrial), I can't really fault them. I can still fault them because the perp was as guilty as can be.
16 posted on
10/28/2006 2:12:02 PM PDT by
steveegg
(Let's make the deeply-saddened Head KOmmie deeply soddened in Nov. - deny the 'RATs the election)
To: steveegg
I can still fault them because the perp was as guilty as can be. That's for the jury to decide, not the judge though. And the judge was wrong for telling them that was the only verdict they could come to.
17 posted on
10/28/2006 2:30:48 PM PDT by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
To: steveegg
Since the Supreme Court of Canada simply ordered a retrial (instead of the typical 9th Circus/lieberal Lawgivers-In-Black complete vacation and no retrial), I can't really fault them. It could be because we have the "no double jeopardy" rule from the Fifth Amendment that Canada doesn't have.
18 posted on
10/28/2006 2:33:25 PM PDT by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson