Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rice's approving 'gay' remarks rankle GOP base, Secretary welcomed new AIDS ambassador's
WND ^ | 10.17.06

Posted on 10/17/2006 2:12:04 PM PDT by Coleus


Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice assists newly sworn-in Ambassador Mark Dybul as he signs appointment documents Oct. 10 at the State Department (White House photo
The Bush administration's swearing-in of an openly homosexual global AIDS ambassador and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice's approving remarks during the ceremony about his lifestyle are reflective of a Republican party "identity crisis," say some family advocates in the nation's capital. While the party wants the support of "values voters," it also is courting homosexuals and seems willing to appease the movement's radical agenda, USA Today said in a feature story.   Rice and first lady Laura Bush spoke for the administration at the Oct. 10 swearing-in at the State Department where Dybul was accompanied by his male partner, Jason Claire. Rice, during her comments, referred to the presence of Claire's mother and called her Dybul's "mother-in-law."

According to the State Department transcript, Rice said:


Thank you. Thank you very much. I am truly honored and delighted to have the opportunity to swear in Mark Dybul as our next Global AIDS Coordinator. I am pleased to do that in the presence of Mark's parents, Claire and Richard; his partner, Jason; and his mother-in-law, Marilyn. You have wonderful family to support you, Mark, and I know that's always important to us. Welcome.

The use of a term normally reserved for legally married heterosexual families rankled Peter Sprigg, vice president for policy at the Family Research Council, who called Rice's comments "profoundly offensive," according to Agape Press.


Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice swears in Ambassador Mark Dybul (White House photo)

The secretary's remarks, he said, fly in the face of the Bush administration's endorsement of a federal marriage protection amendment.  "We have to face the fact that putting a homosexual in charge of AIDS policy is a bit like putting the fox in charge of the henhouse," said Sprigg. "But even beyond that, the deferential treatment that was given not only to him but his partner and his partner's family by the Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice is very distressing."  Sprigg said, according to Agape Press, in light of the Mark Foley scandal, "it's inexplicable that a conservative administration would do such things."

Rice's comments, he added, conflict with a law protecting traditional marriage.  "So, for her to treat his partner like a spouse and treat the partner's mother as a mother-in-law, which implies a marriage between the two partners, is a violation of the spirit if not the letter of the Defense of Marriage Act," Spriggs said.  The Foley scandal has highlighted the number of homosexual staffers working for Republican lawmakers, USA Today noted, causing some family advocates to wonder if this influence has anything to do with the party's lack of action on conservative social issues.

The Family Research Council's Tony Perkins framed the question this way: "Has the social agenda of the GOP been stalled by homosexual members or staffers?"  Dybul is the nation's third openly homosexual ambassador, Agape Press noted, pointing out that in all three cases the homosexual partners held the Bible on which the oath of office was taken.  As WND reported, a new book also has raised the eyebrows of some evangelicals. White House political advisers embraced evangelical supporters publicly to get their votes while mocking them privately as "nuts" and "goofy," according to David Kuo, the former No. 2 man in President Bush's so-called "faith-based" initiatives program.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: drivebymedia; homosexualagenda; wnd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-117 next last
To: Stultis

Especially everyone's parents. :)


41 posted on 10/17/2006 2:38:58 PM PDT by linda_22003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: linda_22003; Stultis
LOL. Have you seen that ad for some hotel, where the guy accidentally walks in on his mother in the shower?


As he's leaving the room with a complete poker face he says....


"Sorry mom."









"and Dad."

Everytime I see it my whole family just rolls laughing. It's hysterical. Therapy for everyone!
42 posted on 10/17/2006 2:43:13 PM PDT by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: misterrob
Good. All the Evangelicals can vote Democrat or stay home so they can then have even more liberals on the courts, gay marriage and a whole bunch of other leftist policies thrown at them.

What is more leftist than this? Your mentality has got us into this mess. Vote the lesser of two evils. The Bible is quite clear on this...

Romans 3:8 (King James Version)

And not rather, (as we be slanderously reported, and as some affirm that we say,) Let us do evil, that good may come? whose damnation is just.

Romans 6:1-2 What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound? 2God forbid. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein?

But you underestimate your Christian Moral Conservative friends.. they will not be voting Democrat, but third party, probable Constitutional.


43 posted on 10/17/2006 2:43:25 PM PDT by LowOiL ("I am neither . I am a Christocrat" - Benjamin Rush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

Why is this news? Crazy dictators with nukes, overseas war, terrorists blowing crap up and the thing that makes a head lines is Rice saying something inconsequential? Sounds like the media is trying to find another thing to divide repubs over.


44 posted on 10/17/2006 2:43:34 PM PDT by stacytec (Nihilism, its whats for dinner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

Any truth to the rumors that Rice isn't playing for the right team?


45 posted on 10/17/2006 2:43:49 PM PDT by SmoothTalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terpin

If he's gay, I don't care as long as he is not in my face with his life style.


46 posted on 10/17/2006 2:44:57 PM PDT by chiefqc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LowOiL

Voting the lesser of two evils is what got us this mess... see Biblical reference in my post above showing NOT to vote the lesser of two evils...


47 posted on 10/17/2006 2:48:06 PM PDT by LowOiL ("I am neither . I am a Christocrat" - Benjamin Rush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

There are some people who think about what gay guys do in the bedroom more often than actual gay guys think about what they do in the bedroom.


48 posted on 10/17/2006 2:49:45 PM PDT by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: chiefqc
If he's gay, I don't care as long as he is not in my face with his life style.

Said the Foley voters who also didn't care that republicans put a open gay person in charge of the page program who happened to turn a blind eye to Foley's romps around the place.

49 posted on 10/17/2006 2:51:25 PM PDT by LowOiL ("I am neither . I am a Christocrat" - Benjamin Rush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: LowOiL

love the sinner, hate the sin. That sounds familiar to me.


50 posted on 10/17/2006 2:57:56 PM PDT by catbertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: durasell

Telling, ain't it? :-)


51 posted on 10/17/2006 2:59:02 PM PDT by Howlin (Why Won't Nancy Pelosi Let Louis Freeh Investigate the Page Scandal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

I don't know how "tellin'" it is, but I have heard rumors these same people have been known to hum that seventies classic "I Will Survive" while at work...


52 posted on 10/17/2006 3:05:10 PM PDT by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: catbertz
love the sinner, hate the sin. That sounds familiar to me.

May sound familiar, but IT IS NOT BIBLICAL... (not in the Bible)... It is a saying made up by liberals and transported to places like forums by people that don't read the Bible because they are brainwashed ???

I will gladly show you what the Bible says to do in judgement.

"Those who rebuke the wicked will have delight, and a good blessing will come upon them." (Prov. 24:25).

God instructs men against "hypocrisy" commanding them to "abhor what is evil" (Rom. 12:9)

53 posted on 10/17/2006 3:09:42 PM PDT by LowOiL ("I am neither . I am a Christocrat" - Benjamin Rush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: durasell

54 posted on 10/17/2006 3:21:21 PM PDT by Howlin (Why Won't Nancy Pelosi Let Louis Freeh Investigate the Page Scandal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

That's Kevin Kline? How'd he get so old, so fast?


55 posted on 10/17/2006 3:25:03 PM PDT by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

Comment #56 Removed by Moderator

To: durasell

I don't know, but I saw him on TV the other day and he DOES look old.

That is a VERY funny movie, if you haven't seen it.


57 posted on 10/17/2006 3:37:14 PM PDT by Howlin (Why Won't Nancy Pelosi Let Louis Freeh Investigate the Page Scandal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Haven't seen it. Liked him in A Fish Called Wanda...


58 posted on 10/17/2006 3:40:43 PM PDT by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: durasell

Oh, you would love this; rent it if you can!


59 posted on 10/17/2006 3:41:24 PM PDT by Howlin (Why Won't Nancy Pelosi Let Louis Freeh Investigate the Page Scandal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: doctorfixit
It's time for a new American Nationalist Party, where we can focus on securing the rights of european americans and Christians.

I have JUST the logo for your campaign!

Take that crap somewhere else; this forum is not about third parties, especially white bigots.

60 posted on 10/17/2006 3:44:26 PM PDT by Howlin (Why Won't Nancy Pelosi Let Louis Freeh Investigate the Page Scandal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-117 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson