Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Coyoteman
No of course not, we were not in the '102. But it was a more advanced single engine-prop plane than the 150 or a 152.

As I recall neither of those planes had retracts and what we were flying did.

W.
53 posted on 10/06/2006 7:59:35 PM PDT by RunningWolf (2-1 Cav 1975)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: RunningWolf
But it was a more advanced single engine-prop plane than the 150 or a 152.

As I recall neither of those planes had retracts and what we were flying did.

I did stall/spin training not far from there about the same time in a 150/152 Aerobat. Great fun!

(I don't think I'd like to spin a '102. About six revs and you're a pancake!)

55 posted on 10/06/2006 8:07:19 PM PDT by Coyoteman (I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson