LOL! Who are you, his mommy?
"My little Paddy is a hero!"
Here's a suggestion: actual heroes do not insist on being referred to as "Dr." - especially when their doctorate is in philosophy and their day job is mismanaging a business that sells other people's leftover crap into the ground.
of the gutter trash . . . your stupidity).
Thanks for the blather.
Failure-to-Delivers . . . with no intention of covering the trade is the issue
Equivalent to a bank depositor complaining that his bank made him wait until Monday morning to withdraw the cash from the check he deposited.
the Threshold list PROVES that the illegal trading takes place regularly
No, it proves that sellers have failed to deliver shares. Which is not illegal.
the Wall Street elites were not making so much money off the backs of innocent investors, the practice of Strategic Naked Short Selling would not exist
No matter what prices investors willingly pay for Wall Street firms' services, intelligent investors would still continue to short lousy stocks.
please explain how a company could remain on the Threshold list for almost two years
Because 0.5% of its shares fail to deliver each week.
It is your lack of decency being exposed. By placing "Dr." in front of Patrick's name is simply out of respect, not demanded by anyone. I would even consider calling you "Dr." after you graduated from high school and later earned a doctorate. LOL
Equivalent to a bank depositor complaining that his bank made him wait until Monday morning to withdraw the cash from the check he deposited.
Again, pure misinformation. The similarity is not even close, but I would bet (even) you know that.
The Threshold List does indeed prove that illegally trading is taking place. Unlike your misstatement, in order to showup on the Threshold List, the stock has to experience FTD's for at least 13-days, WHICH IS ILLEGAL per the Securties Act of 1934.
How would you explain the "Grandfathering Clause" of Reg SHO? If there was nothing illegal, why would the SEC (Wall Street) insist on forgiving the crime, over and over, and over....?
No matter what prices investors willingly pay for Wall Street firms' services, intelligent investors would still continue to short lousy stocks.
And as long as a corrupt SEC continues to coverup the crimes of the prime brokers and their ilk, the criminals will continue to strategically naked short stocks of targeted companies, DESPITE THE VIABILITY OF THAT COMPANY.
When did the SEC obtain the power of the pardon?
Even in their press releases, the SEC admits that the criminals have committed obstruction of justice and fraud, ALL FELONIES, but instead of referring to the Justice Dept., the SEC accepts a bribe, relatively very small compared to the money stolen, and allows the crooks to "never admit nor deny" anything, making it virtually impossible for a civil lawsuit.